Prepared sauces (except gravy, tomato based) manufacturing · Georgia

GSF Conyers Liquid Products

Conyers, GA · ~603 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
4.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

GSF Conyers Liquid Products runs at 27% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Prepared sauces (except gravy, tomato based) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

GSF Conyers Liquid Products: 1.1 TCR = 27% of Prepared sauces (except gravy, tomato based) manufacturing BLS 4.1 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

GSF Conyers Liquid Products safety composite

GSF Conyers Liquid Products scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.8

2016→2021

GSF Conyers Liquid Products injury rate improved

GSF Conyers Liquid Products's TCR fell 0.8 from 2.1 in 2016 to 1.3 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2016 at 2.1 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.59× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.1 · 2017=1.2 · 2018=0.6 · 2019=1.1 · 2020=0.5 · 2021=1.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311941 · Conyers, GA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 27% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK #2/6
  • PHOTO 049-PL001
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 41 inj
  • SIZE ~603 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 049-PL001 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

GSF Conyers Liquid Products in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows GSF Conyers Liquid Products averages 1.1 TCR (27% of the Prepared sauces (except gravy, tomato based) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

GSF Conyers Liquid Products TCR series: 2016=2.1 · 2017=1.2 · 2018=0.6 · 2019=1.1 · 2020=0.5 · 2021=1.3 · BLS 4.1

Where GSF Conyers Liquid Products falls in its industry

134 Prepared sauces (except gravy, establishments

Safer than 92% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 6 Prepared sauces (except gravy, employers in Georgia.

GSF Conyers Liquid Products (603 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 3.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate GSF Conyers Liquid Products
GSF Conyers Liquid Products (603 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 3.8

GSF Conyers Liquid Products has more employees than the Prepared sauces (except gravy, tomato ba median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 1.3 0.7 10 0 0
2020 0.5 0.2 3 0 0
2019 1.1 0.5 7 0 0
2018 0.6 0.1 4 0 0
2017 1.2 0.4 6 0 0
2016 2.1 1.5 11 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311941 · GA · Conyers

134 Prepared sauces (except gravy, tomato based) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 137 employers in Conyers, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 049-PL001 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Winland Foods, Inc 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kraft Heinz 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR T. Marzetti 1.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE EF 604 FTE
STATE-SIZE 540-FC004 604 FTE
STATE-SIZE GA - Google Oakley 601 FTE
STATE-SIZE Power Services : OSS - Onsite Services (US Only) 605 FTE
CITY-NEAR Acuity Brands - Conyers Corporate 1,422 FTE
CITY-NEAR Piedmont Rockdale Hospital 1,016 FTE
CITY-NEAR Acuity Brands Lighting Conyers Complex 980 FTE
CITY-NEAR RCDLGATL 627 FTE
NAT-TCR Wilbur Chocolate 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Outside Plant 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Central Freight Lines, Inc. - Waco Corporate 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 570 - Hartford 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Zotos International Inc. 603 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bemis North America - Oshkosh North 603 FTE
NAT-SIZE TRW Automotive-FH01 603 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hillsboro Genentech 603 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.