Fence installation (except electronic containment fencing for pets) · New Jersey

Guardian Fence Co. Inc.

Newark, NJ · ~36 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Guardian Fence Co. Inc. runs at 24% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Fence installation (except electronic containment fencing for pets) workplace, earning a grade A.

Guardian Fence Co. Inc.: 0.7 TCR = 24% of Fence installation (except electronic containment fencing for pets) BLS 2.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Guardian Fence Co. Inc. safety composite

Guardian Fence Co. Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.0

2016→2024

Guardian Fence Co. Inc. injury rate improved

Guardian Fence Co. Inc.'s TCR fell 3.0 from 3.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 3.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=3.1 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238990 · Newark, NJ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 24% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #6/36
  • PHOTO Tuff Wrap Installati…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~36 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Tuff Wrap Installations (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Guardian Fence Co. Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Guardian Fence Co. Inc. averages 0.7 TCR (24% of the Fence installation (except electronic containment fencing for pets) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Guardian Fence Co. Inc. TCR series: 2016=3 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=3.1 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Guardian Fence Co. Inc. falls in its industry

1,634 Fence installation (except ele establishments

Safer than 80% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 36 Fence installation (except ele employers in New Jersey.

Guardian Fence Co. Inc. (36 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Guardian Fence Co. Inc.
Guardian Fence Co. Inc. (36 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Guardian Fence Co. Inc. has fewer employees than the Fence installation (except electronic co median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 3.1 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 3.0 3.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238990 · NJ · Newark

1,634 Fence installation (except electronic containment fencing for pets) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 356 employers in Newark, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Tuff Wrap Installations 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mann Street Yard 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR IB DICKINSON & SONS, INC 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Service Station Systems, Inc. 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Lakewood Township Municipal Utilities Authority 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Atlantic City Sewerage Company 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE B. Tait Builders, L.L.C. 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Phoenix Diversified Group, Inc. 36 FTE
CITY-NEAR EWR EWR 13,545 FTE
CITY-NEAR EWR - Airport United Airlines Offices 13,015 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-EWR 11,764 FTE
CITY-NEAR EWRPW9829 EWR - NON AA PAX SER 4,772 FTE
NAT-TCR Barr Laboratories, Inc., (subsidiary of Teva Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR BAE Systems Electronic Systems ENY 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR St. Gabriel Site 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR CMC Recycling Odessa 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Abasco Inc 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE NSA 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE 9 Brooksite Drive 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE XDV 36 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.