Intellectual and developmental disability homes · Massachusetts

Guidewire Springfield

Springfield, MA · ~377 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Guidewire Springfield runs at 36% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Intellectual and developmental disability homes workplace, earning a grade A.

Guidewire Springfield: 1.4 TCR = 36% of Intellectual and developmental disability homes BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Guidewire Springfield safety composite

Guidewire Springfield scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.0

2019→2023

Guidewire Springfield injury rate improved

Guidewire Springfield's TCR fell 1.0 from 2.0 in 2019 to 1.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2019 at 2.0 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.72× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=2.0 · 2020=1.0 · 2021=1.5 · 2022=1.5 · 2023=1.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623210 · Springfield, MA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.4 · 36% of ind

  • DART 1.0 DART
  • RANK #2/74
  • PHOTO SUPPORTED INDEPENDEN…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 24 inj
  • SIZE ~377 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SUPPORTED INDEPENDENCE SRVC OF OR - 255 PALOMINO (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Guidewire Springfield in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Guidewire Springfield averages 1.4 TCR (36% of the Intellectual and developmental disability homes BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Guidewire Springfield TCR series: 2019=2 · 2020=1 · 2021=1.5 · 2022=1.5 · 2023=1 · BLS 3.8

Where Guidewire Springfield falls in its industry

2,261 Intellectual and developmental establishments

Safer than 92% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 74 Intellectual and developmental employers in Massachusetts.

Guidewire Springfield (377 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Guidewire Springfield
Guidewire Springfield (377 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8

Guidewire Springfield has more employees than the Intellectual and developmental disabilit median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 1.0 1.0 4 0 0
2022 1.5 1.5 4 0 0
2021 1.5 1.1 4 0 0
2020 1.0 1.0 4 0 0
2019 2.0 1.5 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623210 · MA · Springfield

2,261 Intellectual and developmental disability homes employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 215 employers in Springfield, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SUPPORTED INDEPENDENCE SRVC OF OR - 255 PALOMINO 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR ACR Homes-main office 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Harlingen HCS 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chester Residential Community Homes 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Old Neighborohood Foods 377 FTE
STATE-SIZE Charles River Medical Associates PC 377 FTE
STATE-SIZE Market Basket #58 378 FTE
STATE-SIZE Market Basket #82 376 FTE
CITY-NEAR BMC - Baystate Medical Center 8,310 FTE
CITY-NEAR BMP - Baystate Medical Practices 1,977 FTE
CITY-NEAR Blue Tarp Redevelopment, LLC d/b/a MGM Springfield 1,867 FTE
CITY-NEAR BMF - Baystate Medical Practices 1,746 FTE
NAT-TCR MC Plant 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Portland Public Schoo* 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Wilson & Harding Golf 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Gonzales TX Purina Feed Mill 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Connell Wa 377 FTE
NAT-SIZE BAE Systems Electronic Systems CIA02 377 FTE
NAT-SIZE Smithfield Inc. 377 FTE
NAT-SIZE Blumenthal Performing Arts 377 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.