Shipyard (i.e., facility capable of building ships) · Mississippi

Gulf Coast Shipyard Group

Gulfport, MS · ~91 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Gulf Coast Shipyard Group runs at 162% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Shipyard (i.e., facility capable of building ships) workplace, earning a grade D.

Gulf Coast Shipyard Group: 5.3 TCR = 162% of Shipyard (i.e., facility capable of building ships) BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Gulf Coast Shipyard Group safety composite

Gulf Coast Shipyard Group scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 39%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.2

2016→2020

Gulf Coast Shipyard Group injury rate improved

Gulf Coast Shipyard Group's TCR fell 7.2 from 7.2 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 7.6 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.2 · 2017=5.3 · 2018=7.6 · 2019=6.6 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336611 · Gulfport, MS ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.3 · 162% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #16/19
  • PHOTO Prime Time Coatings …
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 27 inj
  • SIZE ~91 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Prime Time Coatings Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Mississippi employers → · Look up another →

Gulf Coast Shipyard Group in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Gulf Coast Shipyard Group averages 5.3 TCR (162% of the Shipyard (i.e., facility capable of building ships) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Gulf Coast Shipyard Group TCR series: 2016=7.2 · 2017=5.3 · 2018=7.6 · 2019=6.6 · 2020=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Gulf Coast Shipyard Group falls in its industry

454 Shipyard (i.e., facility capab establishments

Safer than 39% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Mississippi alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 19 Shipyard (i.e., facility capab employers in Mississippi.

Gulf Coast Shipyard Group (91 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 100 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Gulf Coast Shipyard Group
Gulf Coast Shipyard Group (91 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 100 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Gulf Coast Shipyard Group has fewer employees than the Shipyard (i.e., facility capable of buil median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 6.6 6.6 2 0 0
2018 7.6 1.5 4 1 0
2017 5.3 2.3 7 0 0
2016 7.2 1.5 14 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336611 · MS · Gulfport

454 Shipyard (i.e., facility capable of building ships) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,083 rated employers in Mississippi with headcount on file · 169 employers in Gulfport, MS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Prime Time Coatings Inc 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Colonnas Shipyard, Inc. 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Trident - Repair Hawaii 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Thermcor Inc 5.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sanderson Farms Hazlehurst Production 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ocean Harvesters, Moss Point, MS Facility 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE Greenville Metal Works Inc 91 FTE
STATE-SIZE Chickasaw Container Corporation 91 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gulfport 4,273 FTE
CITY-NEAR Island View Casino Resort 1,566 FTE
CITY-NEAR Garden Park Medical Center 484 FTE
CITY-NEAR 969 381 FTE
NAT-TCR Highgate at Paoli Pointe 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR San Marcos Store 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 30 Santa Maria 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 1 West Lane 5.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Steel & O'Brien Mfg. Inc. 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE Greenville Place 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nippon Shokubai America Industries, Inc. - Houston Site 91 FTE
NAT-SIZE Country Coffee, Inc dba: Distant Lands Coffee Roaster 91 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.