Homes for the elderly with nursing care · New York

Gurwin Jewish ~ Fay J. Lindner Residences

Commack, NY · ~100 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
15.2
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Gurwin Jewish ~ Fay J. Lindner Residences runs at 233% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Homes for the elderly with nursing care workplace, earning a grade F.

Gurwin Jewish ~ Fay J. Lindner Residences: 15.2 TCR = 233% of Homes for the elderly with nursing care BLS 6.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Gurwin Jewish ~ Fay J. Lindner Residences safety composite

Gurwin Jewish ~ Fay J. Lindner Residences scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

18/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

DART rate
F 40.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Gurwin Jewish ~ Fay J. Lindner Residences: 7.6 → 74.3 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 74.3 TCR · DART/TCR 4.71× in 2022

Gurwin Jewish ~ Fay J. Lindner Residences's TCR rose 66.7 from 7.6 in 2016 to 74.3 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 4.71× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Commack, NY ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 15.2 · 233% of ind

  • DART 71.4 DART
  • RANK #546/616
  • PHOTO Forest Hills Assiste…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 30 inj
  • SIZE ~100 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Forest Hills Assisted Living Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Gurwin Jewish ~ Fay J. Lindner Residences in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Gurwin Jewish ~ Fay J. Lindner Residences averages 15.2 TCR (233% of the Homes for the elderly with nursing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Gurwin Jewish ~ Fay J. Lindner Residences TCR series: 2016=7.6 · 2017=6.3 · 2018=6.2 · 2021=40.6 · 2022=74.3 · BLS 6.5

Where Gurwin Jewish ~ Fay J. Lindner Residences falls in its industry

15,252 Homes for the elderly with nur establishments

Safer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #546 safest of 616 Homes for the elderly with nur employers in New York.

Gurwin Jewish ~ Fay J. Lindner Residences (100 employees, TCR 15.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Gurwin Jewish ~ Fay J. Lindner Residences
Gurwin Jewish ~ Fay J. Lindner Residences (100 employees, TCR 15.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Gurwin Jewish ~ Fay J. Lindner Residences has fewer employees than the Homes for the elderly with nursing care median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 74.3 71.4 9 43 0
2021 40.6 40.6 6 23 0
2018 6.2 6.2 5 0 0
2017 6.3 6.3 5 0 0
2016 7.6 6.3 5 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · NY · Commack

15,252 Homes for the elderly with nursing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 66 employers in Commack, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Forest Hills Assisted Living Center 15.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fountain View Health & Rehabilitation Center 15.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Retirement and Nursing Facility 15.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bloomignton RHCC 15.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Carver Sand & Gravel LLC. 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tonawanda SC 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE O&M Turbo Blading 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE MLJ Contracting 100 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gurwin Jewish Nursing & Rehabilitation Center 719 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1108 - Commack 321 FTE
CITY-NEAR 5202 316 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0240 - COMMACK NY WHSE 286 FTE
NAT-TCR BayPointe 15.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 266319-Min-Lake Street Sta 15.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 250158-Allen Park Po 15.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 388278-Tol-Toledo Main Station 15.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Fiesta # 97 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cacs Ca Irvine 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE 5472-NAI-0034-0034-00831 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE 5472-NAI-0034-0034-02820 100 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.