Distribution of electric power · Georgia

Gwinnett District - Jackson EMC

Jefferson, GA · ~96 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Gwinnett District - Jackson EMC runs at 93% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Distribution of electric power workplace, earning a grade C.

Gwinnett District - Jackson EMC: 1.1 TCR = 93% of Distribution of electric power BLS 1.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Gwinnett District - Jackson EMC safety composite

Gwinnett District - Jackson EMC scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.2

2019→2020

Gwinnett District - Jackson EMC injury rate improved

Gwinnett District - Jackson EMC's TCR fell 2.2 from 2.2 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 2.2 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=2.2 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Jefferson, GA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 1.1 · 93% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #11/149
  • PHOTO SUSSC Susquehanna Se…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~96 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SUSSC Susquehanna Service Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Gwinnett District - Jackson EMC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Gwinnett District - Jackson EMC averages 1.1 TCR (93% of the Distribution of electric power BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Gwinnett District - Jackson EMC TCR series: 2019=2.2 · 2020=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Gwinnett District - Jackson EMC falls in its industry

2,958 Distribution of electric power establishments

Safer than 80% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 149 Distribution of electric power employers in Georgia.

Gwinnett District - Jackson EMC (96 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Gwinnett District - Jackson EMC
Gwinnett District - Jackson EMC (96 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Gwinnett District - Jackson EMC has more employees than the Distribution of electric power median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.2 2.2 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · GA · Jefferson

2,958 Distribution of electric power employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 62 employers in Jefferson, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SUSSC Susquehanna Service Center 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Middle Tennessee Electric (Central Office) 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR LUMA, Monacillos and San Juan Region 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Raleigh North Transmission and Distribution Operations Center 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Atlanta Operating - 760 Ralph McGill Boulevard 96 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gwinnett Operating 1453 Highway 120 Lawrenceville 96 FTE
STATE-SIZE Columbus Operating - 3610 Gentian Boulevard Columbus, GA 96 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rome Operating - 224 Holmes Rd Rome 96 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - MGE5 2,098 FTE
CITY-NEAR HomeGoods Jefferson Distribution Center 1,274 FTE
CITY-NEAR H.G. Georgia Merchants, LLC 1,254 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon Transportation Services : MGE5 1,248 FTE
NAT-TCR Meijer 27 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Standard Contracting Inc. 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Food Safety Net Services, Ltd - Springdale Lab 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Five Star Main Office 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE 235 West Nyack Rd 96 FTE
NAT-SIZE Grand Pacific Palisades Hotel, L.P. 96 FTE
NAT-SIZE CHA 96 FTE
NAT-SIZE Miller's Smorgasbord 96 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.