Home construction organizations, work (sweat) equity · Colorado

Habitat for Humanity of Metro Denver

Denver, CO · ~86 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Habitat for Humanity of Metro Denver runs at 118% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Home construction organizations, work (sweat) equity workplace, earning a grade C.

Habitat for Humanity of Metro Denver: 4.5 TCR = 118% of Home construction organizations, work (sweat) equity BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Habitat for Humanity of Metro Denver safety composite

Habitat for Humanity of Metro Denver scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.7

2022→2024

Habitat for Humanity of Metro Denver injury rate improved

Habitat for Humanity of Metro Denver's TCR fell 0.7 from 6.4 in 2022 to 5.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 6.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.26× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=6.4 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=5.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624229 · Denver, CO ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 4.5 · 118% of ind

  • DART 5.6 DART
  • RANK #2/9
  • PHOTO EB Care Center
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~86 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: EB Care Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

Habitat for Humanity of Metro Denver in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Habitat for Humanity of Metro Denver averages 4.5 TCR (118% of the Home construction organizations, work (sweat) equity BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Habitat for Humanity of Metro Denver TCR series: 2022=6.4 · 2023=1.4 · 2024=5.6 · BLS 3.8

Where Habitat for Humanity of Metro Denver falls in its industry

89 Home construction organization establishments

Safer than 38% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 9 Home construction organization employers in Colorado.

Habitat for Humanity of Metro Denver (86 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Habitat for Humanity of Metro Denver
Habitat for Humanity of Metro Denver (86 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.6

Habitat for Humanity of Metro Denver has more employees than the Home construction organizations, work (s median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.6 5.6 3 0 0
2023 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2022 6.4 4.8 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624229 · CO · Denver

89 Home construction organizations, work (sweat) equity employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 1,757 employers in Denver, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR EB Care Center 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6705_15669 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Charitable Assistance to Community's Homeless (CATCH) 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR McDonnell Center CBCF 4.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Innova Global Inc 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE 102812 - Craig Generating Station - NOx Removal 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE Faith Enterprises Incorporated 86 FTE
STATE-SIZE Division #4 86 FTE
CITY-NEAR DEN DEN 9,832 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-DEN 6,769 FTE
CITY-NEAR DEN - Airport United Airlines Offices 5,277 FTE
CITY-NEAR CO-01 4,581 FTE
NAT-TCR Algona Feed Delivery -Est 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Courtyard Shreveport 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Millwood, Inc. Vienna WW 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Kimil Co 4.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Select Specialty Hospital - Fort Smith, Inc 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE Champion Industrial Contractors, Inc. 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE United Refrigeration, Inc. (#800) 86 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wendricks Truss Inc 86 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.