Engineered Wood Member Manufacturing · Maryland

Hagerstown MD Truss

Hagerstown, MD · ~32 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hagerstown MD Truss runs at 285% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Engineered Wood Member Manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Hagerstown MD Truss: 9.4 TCR = 285% of Engineered Wood Member Manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hagerstown MD Truss safety composite

Hagerstown MD Truss scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−26.9

2016→2024

Hagerstown MD Truss injury rate improved

Hagerstown MD Truss's TCR fell 26.9 from 26.9 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 26.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=26.9 · 2017=14.7 · 2018=10.9 · 2019=19.8 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=7.1 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=5.1 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 321215 · Hagerstown, MD ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.4 · 285% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/5
  • PHOTO Lake County FL Wall …
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 33 inj
  • SIZE ~32 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lake County FL Wall Panel (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Hagerstown MD Truss in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hagerstown MD Truss averages 9.4 TCR (285% of the Engineered Wood Member Manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hagerstown MD Truss TCR series: 2016=26.9 · 2017=14.7 · 2018=10.9 · 2019=19.8 · 2020=0 · 2021=7.1 · 2022=0 · 2023=5.1 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Hagerstown MD Truss falls in its industry

143 Engineered Wood Member Manufac establishments

Safer than 7% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 5 Engineered Wood Member Manufac employers in Maryland.

Hagerstown MD Truss (32 employees, TCR 9.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Hagerstown MD Truss
Hagerstown MD Truss (32 employees, TCR 9.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Hagerstown MD Truss has fewer employees than the Engineered Wood Member Manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 5.1 5.1 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 7.1 3.5 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 19.8 8.5 7 0 0
2018 10.9 5.4 4 0 0
2017 14.7 11.4 9 0 0
2016 26.9 21.6 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

321215 · MD · Hagerstown

143 Engineered Wood Member Manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 205 employers in Hagerstown, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lake County FL Wall Panel 9.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jacksonville ICG 9.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Alma MI Panel 8.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Truss Craft of Nebraska 8.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hayes Construction Company 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Historic Restoration, Inc. 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Otis Elevator Company-Maryland 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Oliff Construction Inc 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR Meritus Health 2,796 FTE
CITY-NEAR Meritus Medical Center 2,460 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6458-HAGE 1,921 FTE
CITY-NEAR Volvo Group Trucks Operations - Hagerstown, Maryland 1,592 FTE
NAT-TCR Homewood Suites Falls Church 9.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Universal Services Associates, Inc. 9.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Carlton Skilled Nursing LLC 9.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Digital Room LLC - Van Nuys 9.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Southport NC Yard 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Salt Lake City UT Millwork 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shafter CA Truss 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sedona AZ Home Center 32 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.