Drilling equipment, oil and gas field-type, manufacturing · Texas

Halliburton - Jet Research Center

Alvarado, TX · ~253 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Halliburton - Jet Research Center runs at 16% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Drilling equipment, oil and gas field-type, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Halliburton - Jet Research Center: 0.5 TCR = 16% of Drilling equipment, oil and gas field-type, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Halliburton - Jet Research Center safety composite

Halliburton - Jet Research Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 42%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Halliburton - Jet Research Center: 0.0 → 0.5 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 1.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.96× in 2024

Halliburton - Jet Research Center's TCR rose 0.5 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 1.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.96× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333132 · Alvarado, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 16% of ind

  • DART 0.5 DART
  • RANK #51/208
  • PHOTO Baker Hughes Pump Pl…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~253 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Baker Hughes Pump Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Halliburton - Jet Research Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Halliburton - Jet Research Center averages 0.5 TCR (16% of the Drilling equipment, oil and gas field-type, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Halliburton - Jet Research Center TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0.7 · 2019=0.3 · 2020=0 · 2021=0.5 · 2022=0.8 · 2023=1.3 · 2024=0.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Halliburton - Jet Research Center falls in its industry

316 Drilling equipment, oil and ga establishments

Safer than 79% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #51 safest of 208 Drilling equipment, oil and ga employers in Texas.

Halliburton - Jet Research Center (253 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 1.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Halliburton - Jet Research Center
Halliburton - Jet Research Center (253 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 1.3

Halliburton - Jet Research Center has more employees than the Drilling equipment, oil and gas field-ty median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.5 0.5 2 0 0
2023 1.3 1.3 5 0 0
2022 0.8 0.4 2 0 0
2021 0.5 0.5 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.3 0.3 1 0 0
2018 0.7 0.7 2 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333132 · TX · Alvarado

316 Drilling equipment, oil and gas field-type, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 31 employers in Alvarado, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Baker Hughes Pump Plant 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Navigation 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR NOV McAlester Rig Operations 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Venture Repair Center 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Construction 253 FTE
STATE-SIZE BrandSafway, LLC - Total Port Arthur Refinery 253 FTE
STATE-SIZE Azteca Milling, L.P. 253 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rudys Food Products INC 253 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sabre Tubular and Structures 470 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sabre Tubular Structures 464 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6768-67680038-1707 314 FTE
CITY-NEAR Thompson Pipe Group Precast Alvarado 172 FTE
NAT-TCR Inova Fairfax EVS 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Gallaudet Plaza 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Massachusetts Division Office 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 000800-Memphis Tn-Corp Office 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE 0530 - Omaha NW 253 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1144 - Coon Rapids 253 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1182 - Greenville 253 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1193 - Gaithersburg 253 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.