Skilled nursing facilities · New York

hamilton park nursing & rehabilitation center

Brooklyn, NY · ~255 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.9
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

hamilton park nursing & rehabilitation center runs at 44% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade A.

hamilton park nursing & rehabilitation center: 2.9 TCR = 44% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

hamilton park nursing & rehabilitation center safety composite

hamilton park nursing & rehabilitation center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 85% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.6

2017→2019

hamilton park nursing & rehabilitation center injury rate improved

hamilton park nursing & rehabilitation center's TCR fell 0.6 from 2.7 in 2017 to 2.1 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 3.8 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.54× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=2.7 · 2018=3.8 · 2019=2.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Brooklyn, NY AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 2.9 · 44% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #128/616
  • PHOTO Anson Health and Reh…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~255 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Anson Health and Rehabilitation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

hamilton park nursing & rehabilitation center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows hamilton park nursing & rehabilitation center averages 2.9 TCR (44% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

hamilton park nursing & rehabilitation center TCR series: 2017=2.7 · 2018=3.8 · 2019=2.1 · BLS 6.5

Where hamilton park nursing & rehabilitation center falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 85% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #128 safest of 616 Skilled nursing facilities employers in New York.

hamilton park nursing & rehabilitation center (255 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate hamilton park nursing & rehabilitation center
hamilton park nursing & rehabilitation center (255 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

hamilton park nursing & rehabilitation center has more employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 2.1 1.6 4 0 0
2018 3.8 3.8 7 0 0
2017 2.7 2.7 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · NY · Brooklyn

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 941 employers in Brooklyn, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Anson Health and Rehabilitation 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chapin Acquisition I, LLC 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Riverside Convalescent Center Saluda 5301 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR CREEKSIDE VILLAGE 2.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE New York Locations 255 FTE
STATE-SIZE Owens-Brockway Glass Container Inc. - Auburn, NY 255 FTE
STATE-SIZE Joe Basil Chevrolet, Inc. 255 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 1813 255 FTE
CITY-NEAR EDI - Brooklyn 946 9,270 FTE
CITY-NEAR S & A Unified Home Care, Inc. 7,782 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maimonides Medical Center 6,641 FTE
CITY-NEAR NYU Langone Hospital - Brooklyn 5,690 FTE
NAT-TCR SPX Heat Transfer LLC 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Morgantown Energy Associates - NRG Energy Services 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Sugarloaf Mills 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Marrs Electric Inc. of Arkansas 2.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE DTE Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant Modifications Maintenance Services and Engineering 255 FTE
NAT-SIZE Libraries 255 FTE
NAT-SIZE West Mifflin 255 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cusanos Baking Company 255 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.