Hotels, resort, without casinos · Minnesota

Hampton Inn & Suites Minneapolis Downtown

Minneapolis, MN · ~47 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.7
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hampton Inn & Suites Minneapolis Downtown runs at 89% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Hotels, resort, without casinos workplace, earning a grade C.

Hampton Inn & Suites Minneapolis Downtown: 2.7 TCR = 89% of Hotels, resort, without casinos BLS 3.0 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hampton Inn & Suites Minneapolis Downtown safety composite

Hampton Inn & Suites Minneapolis Downtown scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 44%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.7

2016→2019

Hampton Inn & Suites Minneapolis Downtown injury rate improved

Hampton Inn & Suites Minneapolis Downtown's TCR fell 0.7 from 3.0 in 2016 to 2.3 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 51.6 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.87× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.0 · 2018=51.6 · 2019=2.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 721110 · Minneapolis, MN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.7 · 89% of ind

  • DART 2.3 DART
  • RANK #43/155
  • PHOTO Sonesta Atlanta Airp…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~47 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sonesta Atlanta Airport South (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Hampton Inn & Suites Minneapolis Downtown in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hampton Inn & Suites Minneapolis Downtown averages 2.7 TCR (89% of the Hotels, resort, without casinos BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hampton Inn & Suites Minneapolis Downtown TCR series: 2016=3 · 2018=51.6 · 2019=2.3 · BLS 3.0

Where Hampton Inn & Suites Minneapolis Downtown falls in its industry

9,342 Hotels, resort, without casino establishments

Safer than 76% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #43 safest of 155 Hotels, resort, without casino employers in Minnesota.

Hampton Inn & Suites Minneapolis Downtown (47 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Hampton Inn & Suites Minneapolis Downtown
Hampton Inn & Suites Minneapolis Downtown (47 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8

Hampton Inn & Suites Minneapolis Downtown has fewer employees than the Hotels, resort, without casinos median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 2.3 2.3 1 0 0
2018 51.6 0.0 1 0 0
2016 3.0 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

721110 · MN · Minneapolis

9,342 Hotels, resort, without casinos employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 1,321 employers in Minneapolis, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sonesta Atlanta Airport South 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 11573 ES CHARLESTON-HISTORIC CHARLESTON SC 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 579 CANYONS - GRAND SUMMIT 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hotel Grand Victorian 2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Staples 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Campbell 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Willmar Live Haul 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mille Lacs Energy Cooperative 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Minnesota Twin Cities 22,522 FTE
CITY-NEAR MN950 MN TELECOMMUTER 12,021 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0501 - City Center 8,459 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hennepin County Medical Center 7,030 FTE
NAT-TCR Eventures, LLC 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Sparton Technology Corp Hudson NH 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR ORBIS Corporation - Monticello 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR EMD Millipore 2.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Piggly Wiggly #162 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Schuber Mitchell Homes 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Advanced Drainage Systems Inc.--Brazil 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Reserve Plant 47 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.