Household-type furniture, upholstered, manufacturing · North Carolina

Hancock & Moore Plant 2

Taylorsville, NC · ~57 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hancock & Moore Plant 2 runs at 142% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Household-type furniture, upholstered, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Hancock & Moore Plant 2: 4.7 TCR = 142% of Household-type furniture, upholstered, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hancock & Moore Plant 2 safety composite

Hancock & Moore Plant 2 scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 90% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 48%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 90% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.7

2016→2023

Hancock & Moore Plant 2 injury rate improved

Hancock & Moore Plant 2's TCR fell 9.7 from 9.7 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2019 at 11.7 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=9.7 · 2017=8.0 · 2018=3.5 · 2019=11.7 · 2020=4.5 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 337121 · Taylorsville, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.7 · 142% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #67/114
  • PHOTO Ethan Allen Operatio…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 25 inj
  • SIZE ~57 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ethan Allen Operations, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Hancock & Moore Plant 2 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hancock & Moore Plant 2 averages 4.7 TCR (142% of the Household-type furniture, upholstered, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hancock & Moore Plant 2 TCR series: 2016=9.7 · 2017=8 · 2018=3.5 · 2019=11.7 · 2020=4.5 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Hancock & Moore Plant 2 falls in its industry

300 Household-type furniture, upho establishments

Safer than 48% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #67 safest of 114 Household-type furniture, upho employers in North Carolina.

Hancock & Moore Plant 2 (57 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Hancock & Moore Plant 2
Hancock & Moore Plant 2 (57 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Hancock & Moore Plant 2 has fewer employees than the Household-type furniture, upholstered, m median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 4.5 0.0 3 0 0
2019 11.7 3.9 8 1 0
2018 3.5 0.0 2 1 0
2017 8.0 4.6 6 1 0
2016 9.7 3.2 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

337121 · NC · Taylorsville

300 Household-type furniture, upholstered, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 25 employers in Taylorsville, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ethan Allen Operations, Inc. 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Standard Chair of Gardner 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Prospect St. 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Klaussner Plant 4/51 4.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Corporate Division 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kirlin Builders 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cape Romain / McLean A Joint Venture 57 FTE
STATE-SIZE Engineered Steel Products 57 FTE
CITY-NEAR Alexander County Admin 434 FTE
CITY-NEAR Schneider Mills Inc. 295 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1131 199 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hancock & Moore Plant 1 198 FTE
NAT-TCR Columbia River Log Scaling Bureau 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR New Harvest Road 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Blackmon Mooring of Austin LLC 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Stuart David Inc. 4.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Eckhart & Company Inc 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Canteen of Coastal Ca., inc. 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE Northgate Chrysler Dodge Jeep Ram 57 FTE
NAT-SIZE City Wide Facility Solutions (Phoenix) 57 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.