Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) · Pennsylvania

Hangar 10

West Mifflin, PA · ~33 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.1
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hangar 10 runs at 26% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) workplace, earning a grade A.

Hangar 10: 1.1 TCR = 26% of Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) BLS 4.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hangar 10 safety composite

Hangar 10 scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 85% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.15 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Hangar 10 held a steady TCR band

Hangar 10's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 2.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=0.0 · 2019=2.6 · 2020=2.8 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=2.8 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488190 · West Mifflin, PA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.1 · 26% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/18
  • PHOTO Lockheed Martin Corp…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~33 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lockheed Martin Corporation Hill AFB (1471) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Hangar 10 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hangar 10 averages 1.1 TCR (26% of the Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hangar 10 TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=2.6 · 2020=2.8 · 2021=0 · 2022=2.8 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Hangar 10 falls in its industry

992 Aircraft maintenance and repai establishments

Safer than 85% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 18 Aircraft maintenance and repai employers in Pennsylvania.

Hangar 10 (33 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Hangar 10
Hangar 10 (33 employees, TCR 1.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Hangar 10 has fewer employees than the Aircraft maintenance and repair services median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 2.8 0.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 2.8 0.0 1 0 0
2019 2.6 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488190 · PA · West Mifflin

992 Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 42 employers in West Mifflin, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lockheed Martin Corporation Hill AFB (1471) 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR BWI SWA 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR PKL Services, Miramar 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Textron Aviation San Antonio Service Center 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Caputo & Guest 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Colver Power Project 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Oil City 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Norristown Operations 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR Irvin Plant 928 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kennywood Park 841 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2281 504 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2281 493 FTE
NAT-TCR Hilton Garden Inn Gulfport 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Kiepersol Enterprises, Inc. 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Gorham Admin. Operations 1.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Seymour Community Schools 1.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Production Ave 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Seattle, WA 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Larson Juhl La 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sun Services 33 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.