Employer · Indiana

Hanson Cold Storage Co. of Indiana - Hobart

Hobart, IN · ~96 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
6.5
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hanson Cold Storage Co. of Indiana - Hobart runs at 113% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical industry workplace, earning a grade C.

Hanson Cold Storage Co. of Indiana - Hobart: 6.5 TCR = 113% of industry BLS 5.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hanson Cold Storage Co. of Indiana - Hobart safety composite

Hanson Cold Storage Co. of Indiana - Hobart scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 72% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.9

2016→2019

Hanson Cold Storage Co. of Indiana - Hobart injury rate improved

Hanson Cold Storage Co. of Indiana - Hobart's TCR fell 5.9 from 9.3 in 2016 to 3.5 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2017 at 9.5 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.13× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=9.3 · 2017=9.5 · 2018=3.8 · 2019=3.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493120 · Hobart, IN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 6.5 · 113% of ind

  • DART 0.9 DART
  • RANK #22/27
  • PHOTO Mom's Meals North Ja…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 32 inj
  • SIZE ~96 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Mom's Meals North Jackson Fulfillment (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Hanson Cold Storage Co. of Indiana - Hobart in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hanson Cold Storage Co. of Indiana - Hobart averages 6.5 TCR (113% of the industry BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hanson Cold Storage Co. of Indiana - Hobart TCR series: 2016=9.3 · 2017=9.5 · 2018=3.8 · 2019=3.5 · BLS 5.8

Where Hanson Cold Storage Co. of Indiana - Hobart falls in its industry

1,039 industry establishments

Safer than 23% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #22 safest of 27 industry employers in Indiana.

Hanson Cold Storage Co. of Indiana - Hobart (96 employees, TCR 6.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 68 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Hanson Cold Storage Co. of Indiana - Hobart
Hanson Cold Storage Co. of Indiana - Hobart (96 employees, TCR 6.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 68 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Hanson Cold Storage Co. of Indiana - Hobart has more employees than the industry median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 3.5 0.9 4 0 0
2018 3.8 3.8 5 0 0
2017 9.5 6.0 11 0 0
2016 9.3 9.3 12 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493120 · IN · Hobart

1,039 industry employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 41 employers in Hobart, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Mom's Meals North Jackson Fulfillment 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 80719-PERISHABLE DC-SA 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Co 34 Maines Paper & Food Service, Inc. 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 872 - Pleasant Prairie Fresh Str 6.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Indiana Municipal Power Agency 96 FTE
STATE-SIZE National Water Services 96 FTE
STATE-SIZE 104273 - Headwaters Wind Farm 200MW 96 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cobalt Civil, LLC 96 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Mary Medical Center 1,394 FTE
CITY-NEAR Daifuku Wynright Corporation 774 FTE
CITY-NEAR Stevens Engineers & Constructors - Hobart 164 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sebo's Nursing & Rehabilitation Center 137 FTE
NAT-TCR 8701 W 50th Street 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Oelwein Facility 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Andersen Consolidation Center 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Kw International(Ga_ellenwood) 6.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Atlanta Operating - 760 Ralph McGill Boulevard 96 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kenilworth Office 96 FTE
NAT-SIZE 6962-Swy 0029 3086 96 FTE
NAT-SIZE 6962-Swy 0029 2659 96 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.