Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade · Alabama

Hantal Alabama Corporation

Cusseta, AL · ~88 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hantal Alabama Corporation runs at 156% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade workplace, earning a grade D.

Hantal Alabama Corporation: 5.2 TCR = 156% of Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hantal Alabama Corporation safety composite

Hantal Alabama Corporation scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 29%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.15 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.5

2017→2024

Hantal Alabama Corporation injury rate improved

Hantal Alabama Corporation's TCR fell 5.5 from 9.0 in 2017 to 3.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 9.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.68× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=9.0 · 2019=9.1 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=4.2 · 2024=3.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332813 · Cusseta, AL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.2 · 156% of ind

  • DART 3.5 DART
  • RANK #4/4
  • PHOTO Plastic Plate Monroe
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~88 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Plastic Plate Monroe (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

Hantal Alabama Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hantal Alabama Corporation averages 5.2 TCR (156% of the Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hantal Alabama Corporation TCR series: 2017=9 · 2019=9.1 · 2022=0 · 2023=4.2 · 2024=3.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Hantal Alabama Corporation falls in its industry

585 Electroplating metals and form establishments

Safer than 35% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 4 Electroplating metals and form employers in Alabama.

Hantal Alabama Corporation (88 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Hantal Alabama Corporation
Hantal Alabama Corporation (88 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 4.0

Hantal Alabama Corporation has more employees than the Electroplating metals and formed product median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.5 3.5 3 0 0
2023 4.2 4.2 3 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 9.1 0.0 5 0 0
2017 9.0 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332813 · AL · Cusseta

585 Electroplating metals and formed products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 8 employers in Cusseta, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Plastic Plate Monroe 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Electronic Precision Specialties, Inc. 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR NIA, LLC. 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Erie Hard Chrome, Inc. 5.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Southern Division Complex 88 FTE
STATE-SIZE Process Service Group, LLC 88 FTE
STATE-SIZE Miller & Miller, Inc. 88 FTE
STATE-SIZE Blake Brothers Service Corp 88 FTE
CITY-NEAR Joon, LLC dba AJIN USA 640 FTE
CITY-NEAR Daedong HI-LEX DDHLA 218 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wooshin USA 174 FTE
CITY-NEAR Manufacturing 119 FTE
NAT-TCR Giant Food Stores 6319 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Bernard Welding 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Johnston Farms 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Medical University Hospital Authority 5.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Giant 106 88 FTE
NAT-SIZE Giant 745 88 FTE
NAT-SIZE Giant 753 88 FTE
NAT-SIZE Giant 799 88 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.