General freight trucking, long-distance, truckload (TL) · New Jersey

Hanul Corp. (2-Ridgefield-NJ)

Ridgefield, NJ · ~68 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.7
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hanul Corp. (2-Ridgefield-NJ) runs at 104% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical General freight trucking, long-distance, truckload (TL) workplace, earning a grade C.

Hanul Corp. (2-Ridgefield-NJ): 4.7 TCR = 104% of General freight trucking, long-distance, truckload (TL) BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hanul Corp. (2-Ridgefield-NJ) safety composite

Hanul Corp. (2-Ridgefield-NJ) scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 68% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 28%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.5

2020→2022

Hanul Corp. (2-Ridgefield-NJ) injury rate improved

Hanul Corp. (2-Ridgefield-NJ)'s TCR fell 5.5 from 6.3 in 2020 to 0.8 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 7.0 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.17× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=6.3 · 2021=7.0 · 2022=0.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484121 · Ridgefield, NJ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 4.7 · 104% of ind

  • DART 0.8 DART
  • RANK #31/41
  • PHOTO Church Transportatio…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~68 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Church Transportation & Logistics, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Hanul Corp. (2-Ridgefield-NJ) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hanul Corp. (2-Ridgefield-NJ) averages 4.7 TCR (104% of the General freight trucking, long-distance, truckload (TL) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hanul Corp. (2-Ridgefield-NJ) TCR series: 2020=6.3 · 2021=7 · 2022=0.8 · BLS 4.5

Where Hanul Corp. (2-Ridgefield-NJ) falls in its industry

3,252 General freight trucking, long establishments

Safer than 28% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #31 safest of 41 General freight trucking, long employers in New Jersey.

Hanul Corp. (2-Ridgefield-NJ) (68 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Hanul Corp. (2-Ridgefield-NJ)
Hanul Corp. (2-Ridgefield-NJ) (68 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Hanul Corp. (2-Ridgefield-NJ) has more employees than the General freight trucking, long-distance, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.8 0.8 1 0 0
2021 7.0 7.0 2 1 0
2020 6.3 6.3 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484121 · NJ · Ridgefield

3,252 General freight trucking, long-distance, truckload (TL) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 23 employers in Ridgefield, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Church Transportation & Logistics, Inc. 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Carry Transit - Arlington 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR HAZMAT ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP, INC. - LACKAWANNA 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Summit Logistics, Inc. 4.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Columbia Care New Jersey LLC.-Vineland 1 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lambertville 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mercer Group International of New Jersey, Inc. 68 FTE
STATE-SIZE River Terminal Development 68 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sanofi Ridgefield 293 FTE
CITY-NEAR Voyant Beauty Ridgefield 289 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sanofi 262 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ridgefield 159 FTE
NAT-TCR Conco Construction 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR EMLENTON 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR WellBridge of Brighton 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 5116 Adelphi Value Village 4.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sign Pro Inc 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4020180 - UCI Verano 8 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE Namaste Home Health and Hospice 68 FTE
NAT-SIZE 4769-3-Williams Sonoma 68 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.