Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building · Maryland

Harbel Inc

Cumberland, MD · ~22 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Harbel Inc runs at 70% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building workplace, earning a grade B.

Harbel Inc: 2.0 TCR = 70% of Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building BLS 2.9 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Harbel Inc safety composite

Harbel Inc scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 54% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Harbel Inc: 5.5 → 5.9 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 5.9 TCR · DART/TCR 2.88× in 2024

Harbel Inc's TCR rose 0.4 from 5.5 in 2016 to 5.9 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 2.88× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Cumberland, MD AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 70% of ind

  • DART 5.9 DART
  • RANK #58/99
  • PHOTO CAS Constructors, LLC
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CAS Constructors, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Harbel Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Harbel Inc averages 2.0 TCR (70% of the Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Harbel Inc TCR series: 2016=5.5 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=5 · 2024=5.9 · BLS 2.9

Where Harbel Inc falls in its industry

4,692 Addition, alteration and renov establishments

Safer than 54% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #58 safest of 99 Addition, alteration and renov employers in Maryland.

Harbel Inc (22 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Harbel Inc
Harbel Inc (22 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Harbel Inc has fewer employees than the Addition, alteration and renovation for- median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.9 5.9 1 0 0
2023 5.0 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 5.5 5.5 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · MD · Cumberland

4,692 Addition, alteration and renovation for-sale builders, commercial and institutional building employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 58 employers in Cumberland, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CAS Constructors, LLC 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR CEi Construction LLC DBA CEi Builders 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR FB DEV LV 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR D.R. Mozeley Inc. 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE St. Charles Energy Center 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE CRB Builders, LLC - Rockville Office 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE LCS:LC061 - LC061-Elkridge MD 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cherry Hill Construction, Inc. 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR UPMC Western Maryland 1,984 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hunter Douglas Fabrication 729 FTE
CITY-NEAR American Woodmark Corp. 563 FTE
CITY-NEAR American Woodmark Corporation - Allegany Plant 537 FTE
NAT-TCR Vistar Minnesota - 1075 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Prichard (Branch 1) 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR CAS Constructors, LLC 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Sioux Falls 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ambassador Personnel, Inc @ Fbc-Tuscaloosa 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE AMBASSADOR PERSONNEL, INC @ FBC-Lenexa 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Burbank, IL 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Valu Home Center #11 22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.