Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction · California

Harber Companies, Inc.

San Bernardino, CA · ~33 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
5.7
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Harber Companies, Inc. runs at 203% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction workplace, earning a grade F.

Harber Companies, Inc.: 5.7 TCR = 203% of Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction BLS 2.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Harber Companies, Inc. safety composite

Harber Companies, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 18%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

30/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.7

2018→2022

Harber Companies, Inc. injury rate improved

Harber Companies, Inc.'s TCR fell 5.7 from 10.1 in 2018 to 4.5 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 10.1 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.79× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=10.1 · 2019=3.6 · 2021=4.4 · 2022=4.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237310 · San Bernardino, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 5.7 · 203% of ind

  • DART 4.5 DART
  • RANK #489/551
  • PHOTO Maintenance and Oper…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~33 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Maintenance and Operations - La Grande 3016 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Harber Companies, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Harber Companies, Inc. averages 5.7 TCR (203% of the Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Harber Companies, Inc. TCR series: 2018=10.1 · 2019=3.6 · 2021=4.4 · 2022=4.5 · BLS 2.8

Where Harber Companies, Inc. falls in its industry

4,078 Pavement, highway, road, stree establishments

Safer than 25% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #489 safest of 551 Pavement, highway, road, stree employers in California.

Harber Companies, Inc. (33 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Harber Companies, Inc.
Harber Companies, Inc. (33 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Harber Companies, Inc. has fewer employees than the Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 4.5 4.5 1 0 0
2021 4.4 0.0 1 0 0
2019 3.6 3.6 1 0 0
2018 10.1 6.8 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237310 · CA · San Bernardino

4,078 Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 332 employers in San Bernardino, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Maintenance and Operations - La Grande 3016 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR CAPITAL EXCAVATION COMPANY 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Division of Transportation 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Main Office-Logansport 5.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Tutti Frutti Farms 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE EL CENTRO 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE BULLSEYE FARMS 18 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE River Vista Farms LLC 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sheriff Department 3,321 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : ONT2 2,856 FTE
CITY-NEAR Transitional Assistance Department 2,824 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon Transportation Services : ONT5 2,475 FTE
NAT-TCR Vuteq USA 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Food City Store #773 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR TMW-ODFL 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR LP Lexington Tanbark Road, LLC 5.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sky Plaza IGA 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Quality Steel Services 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tops #278 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Plaza Construction DC 33 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.