Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Washington

Harbour Pointe Senior Living

Mukilteo, WA · ~73 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Harbour Pointe Senior Living runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade C.

Harbour Pointe Senior Living: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Harbour Pointe Senior Living safety composite

Harbour Pointe Senior Living scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

82/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Harbour Pointe Senior Living held a steady TCR band

Harbour Pointe Senior Living's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2018 at 0.0 TCR.

2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Mukilteo, WA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/216
  • PHOTO Brookdale chapel hill
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~73 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Brookdale chapel hill (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Harbour Pointe Senior Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Harbour Pointe Senior Living averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Harbour Pointe Senior Living TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Harbour Pointe Senior Living falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 216 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Washington.

Harbour Pointe Senior Living (73 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Harbour Pointe Senior Living
Harbour Pointe Senior Living (73 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Harbour Pointe Senior Living has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · WA · Mukilteo

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 37 employers in Mukilteo, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Brookdale chapel hill 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kinship Pointe Seward 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Conway 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Centennial Park 0.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Meadow Sage Logistics LLC 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cascade Park Gardens 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tekton Group LLC 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE F/T Alaska Spirit 73 FTE
CITY-NEAR WA012 1,421 FTE
CITY-NEAR Travis Industries 534 FTE
CITY-NEAR Electroimpact Inc. 383 FTE
CITY-NEAR Systima Technologies Inc 322 FTE
NAT-TCR Atlanta - Phipps 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Meijer 208 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Gap Inc. - Corporate 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Binghamton 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE US573 US Tray 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE John J. Allison, Jr. Polaris Center 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Graduate Iowa City 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Childers Roofing & Sheetmetal, Inc 73 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.