Aircraft auxiliary parts (e.g., crop dusting, external fuel tanks, inflight refueling equipment) manufacturing · Kansas

Harlow Aerostructures LLC

Wichtia, KS · ~119 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Harlow Aerostructures LLC runs at 167% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Aircraft auxiliary parts (e.g., crop dusting, external fuel tanks, inflight refueling equipment) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Harlow Aerostructures LLC: 5.5 TCR = 167% of Aircraft auxiliary parts (e.g., crop dusting, external fuel tanks, inflight refueling equipment) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Harlow Aerostructures LLC safety composite

Harlow Aerostructures LLC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

21/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Harlow Aerostructures LLC: 4.9 → 6.2 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 6.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.56× in 2024

Harlow Aerostructures LLC's TCR rose 1.3 from 4.9 in 2023 to 6.2 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.56× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336413 · Wichtia, KS ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.5 · 167% of ind

  • DART 3.1 DART
  • RANK #26/32
  • PHOTO All Power Manufacutu…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~119 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: All Power Manufacuturing Co. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kansas employers → · Look up another →

Harlow Aerostructures LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Harlow Aerostructures LLC averages 5.5 TCR (167% of the Aircraft auxiliary parts (e.g., crop dusting, external fuel tanks, inflight refueling equipment) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Harlow Aerostructures LLC TCR series: 2023=4.9 · 2024=6.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Harlow Aerostructures LLC falls in its industry

650 Aircraft auxiliary parts (e.g. establishments

Safer than 10% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Kansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #26 safest of 32 Aircraft auxiliary parts (e.g. employers in Kansas.

Harlow Aerostructures LLC (119 employees, TCR 5.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Harlow Aerostructures LLC
Harlow Aerostructures LLC (119 employees, TCR 5.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Harlow Aerostructures LLC has fewer employees than the Aircraft auxiliary parts (e.g., crop dus median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.2 3.1 8 0 0
2023 4.9 2.4 4 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336413 · KS · Wichtia

650 Aircraft auxiliary parts (e.g., crop dusting, external fuel tanks, inflight refueling equipment) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 5,228 rated employers in Kansas with headcount on file · 3 employers in Wichtia, KS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR All Power Manufacuturing Co. 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cadence Aerospace - Torrance 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Airframes Alaska - Fairbanks Location 5.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Park Aerospace Corp. 5.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hutchinson - Paper - B282 119 FTE
STATE-SIZE Palmer Manufacturing & Tank 119 FTE
STATE-SIZE BAADER LINCO, Inc. 119 FTE
STATE-SIZE Triumph Accessory Services 119 FTE
CITY-NEAR Envision, Inc - Water Street 230 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tramco Inc 72 FTE
NAT-TCR EB Martin Luther Manor 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Ncash - Asheville 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Ncgre - Greensboro Hub 5.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Nhmht - Manchester Airport 5.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Windsor Care Center of Sacramento 119 FTE
NAT-SIZE Madison 119 FTE
NAT-SIZE Air System Components 119 FTE
NAT-SIZE McLane Classic Foods 119 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.