Sheet metal forming machines manufacturing · New Jersey

Harold R Henrich Inc.

Lakewood, NJ · ~34 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Harold R Henrich Inc. runs at 348% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Sheet metal forming machines manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Harold R Henrich Inc.: 11.5 TCR = 348% of Sheet metal forming machines manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Harold R Henrich Inc. safety composite

Harold R Henrich Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

15/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.5

2017→2024

Harold R Henrich Inc. injury rate improved

Harold R Henrich Inc.'s TCR fell 7.5 from 25.9 in 2017 to 18.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 25.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.8× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=25.9 · 2018=7.8 · 2021=5.6 · 2022=5.5 · 2023=5.8 · 2024=18.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333517 · Lakewood, NJ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.5 · 348% of ind

  • DART 9.2 DART
  • RANK #8/8
  • PHOTO L. E. Sauer Machine …
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 25 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: L. E. Sauer Machine Co. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Harold R Henrich Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Harold R Henrich Inc. averages 11.5 TCR (348% of the Sheet metal forming machines manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Harold R Henrich Inc. TCR series: 2017=25.9 · 2018=7.8 · 2021=5.6 · 2022=5.5 · 2023=5.8 · 2024=18.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Harold R Henrich Inc. falls in its industry

391 Sheet metal forming machines m establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 8 Sheet metal forming machines m employers in New Jersey.

Harold R Henrich Inc. (34 employees, TCR 11.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Harold R Henrich Inc.
Harold R Henrich Inc. (34 employees, TCR 11.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Harold R Henrich Inc. has fewer employees than the Sheet metal forming machines manufacturi median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 18.5 9.2 6 0 0
2023 5.8 0.0 2 0 0
2022 5.5 0.0 2 0 0
2021 5.6 0.0 2 0 0
2018 7.8 2.6 3 0 0
2017 25.9 5.2 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333517 · NJ · Lakewood

391 Sheet metal forming machines manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 94 employers in Lakewood, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR L. E. Sauer Machine Co. 11.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Blough, Inc 11.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Precision Metal Works - Frankfort 11.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Signicast Milwaukee Finishing 11.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE ISE America, Inc Co#3 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Grace Construction Management Company, LLC 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE V.J. Scozzari and Sons, Inc. Hopewell 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Corporate Headquarters 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR NJ-04 4,429 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tender Touch Rehab Services 2,997 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monmouth Medical Center - Southern Campus 622 FTE
CITY-NEAR Renaissane Lakewood LLC 598 FTE
NAT-TCR The Mount, Edith Wharton's Home 11.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - LGB9 11.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Freightliner Western Star of Maine - Bangor 11.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Town of Pendleton 11.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Professional Ski Instructors of America 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kentucky Automotive Enterprises LLC 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Deshler Mechanical Contractors, Inc. 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Harlan 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.