Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors · Connecticut

HARP Home Services

Windsor Locks, CT · ~70 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
14.5
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

HARP Home Services runs at 517% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors workplace, earning a grade F.

HARP Home Services: 14.5 TCR = 517% of Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors BLS 2.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

HARP Home Services safety composite

HARP Home Services scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 14.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

HARP Home Services: 5.1 → 15.4 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 23.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0.14× in 2022

HARP Home Services's TCR rose 10.3 from 5.1 in 2016 to 15.4 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2020 at 23.5 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.14× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238220 · Windsor Locks, CT ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 14.5 · 517% of ind

  • DART 2.1 DART
  • RANK #53/54
  • PHOTO Mark CarpenterPlumbing
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 64 inj
  • SIZE ~70 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Mark CarpenterPlumbing (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

HARP Home Services in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows HARP Home Services averages 14.5 TCR (517% of the Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

HARP Home Services TCR series: 2016=5.1 · 2018=20.6 · 2019=8.3 · 2020=23.5 · 2021=13.9 · 2022=15.4 · BLS 2.8

Where HARP Home Services falls in its industry

5,793 Heating, ventilation and air-c establishments

Safer than 3% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #53 safest of 54 Heating, ventilation and air-c employers in Connecticut.

HARP Home Services (70 employees, TCR 14.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate HARP Home Services
HARP Home Services (70 employees, TCR 14.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

HARP Home Services has more employees than the Heating, ventilation and air-conditionin median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 15.4 2.1 15 0 0
2021 13.9 8.5 13 0 0
2020 23.5 13.2 16 0 0
2019 8.3 5.5 6 0 0
2018 20.6 12.0 12 0 0
2016 5.1 5.1 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238220 · CT · Windsor Locks

5,793 Heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 88 employers in Windsor Locks, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Mark CarpenterPlumbing 14.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Service Champions - Murrieta 14.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hill & Company LTD 14.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Van's Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc 14.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Lebanon 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eversource - Tolland 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pavarini NE Construction Co. LLC 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE Middletown Public Works 70 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hamilton Sundstrand 3,992 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hamilton Sundstrand Corporation (Windsor Locks CT) 3,929 FTE
CITY-NEAR UTC Aerospace Systems Major Business Unit 3,700 FTE
CITY-NEAR BDLXL0001 BDLXL0001 542 FTE
NAT-TCR 050228-Anderson Po 14.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 056693-Sac-Oak Park Sta 14.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 246511-Rockland Po 14.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 6962-SWY-0029-0029-02079 14.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE 548342-Tac-Parkland Br 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE 404576-Klamath Falls Po 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE 407395-Sal-Vista Sta 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE 056695-Sac-Perkins Sta 70 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.