Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Minnesota

Harrison Bay Senior Living

Name: Harrison Bay Senior Living Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Mound, MN · ~31 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

F
Failing Safety Record: 19.3
Avg TCR: 3.8
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Harrison Bay Senior Living runs at 507% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Harrison Bay Senior Living: 19.3 TCR = 507% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Harrison Bay Senior Living safety composite

Harrison Bay Senior Living scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

15/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): F 19.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers
DART rate: F 33.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Harrison Bay Senior Living: 28.0 → 33.9 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 67.6 TCR · DART/TCR 1.76× in 2023

Harrison Bay Senior Living's TCR rose 5.9 from 28.0 in 2018 to 33.9 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 67.6 TCR. In 2023, DART was 1.76× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Mound, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 19.3 · 507% of ind

DART 33.9 DART
RANK #228/240
PHOTO PSL-Sun City West
BOOK 5y book
INJ 10 inj
SIZE ~31 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: PSL-Sun City West (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

This site

19.3
PSL-Sun City W

19.3
The Landings o

19.3
Hometown

19.3
Woodlands Seni

19.2

What this shows Harrison Bay Senior Living averages 19.3 TCR (507% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Harrison Bay Senior Living TCR series: 2018=28 · 2019=13.4 · 2020=67.6 · 2021=1.7 · 2023=33.9 · BLS 3.8

Where Harrison Bay Senior Living falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

Grade F

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #228 safest of 240 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Minnesota.

Harrison Bay Senior Living (31 employees, TCR 19.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Harrison Bay Senior Living has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses
2023	33.9	33.9	2	6
2021	1.7	1.3	2	2
2020	67.6	63.4	2	14
2019	13.4	13.4	3	0
2018	28.0	28.0	1	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · MN · Mound

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 10 employers in Mound, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	PSL-Sun City West	SUN CITY WEST, AZ	19.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR	The Landings of Smithfield	SMITHFIELD, NC	19.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Woodlands Senior Living of Madison LLC	MADISON, ME	19.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Hometown	NORTH RICHLAND, TX	19.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE	High Island Dairy	LE SUEUR	31 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Protein Sources, LLP	MAPLETON	31 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Black Dog Gen Plant-UC	BURNSVILLE	31 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Power Plant	HIBBING	31 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Westonka ISD #277-Hilltop	Mound	70 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Westonka ISD #277-Shirley Hills	Mound	66 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Westonka ISD #277-Grandview	Mound	55 FTE
CITY-NEAR	15150S DRUGSTORE	Mound	30 FTE
NAT-TCR	Whitemarsh Continuing Care Retirement Community	Lafayette Hill, PA	19.3 TCR
NAT-TCR	2253-H4211	Westminster, CA	19.3 TCR
NAT-TCR	Capitol Distributing	Caldwell, ID	19.3 TCR
NAT-TCR	Evaqua Farms Plant	Filer, ID	19.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Vidor	Vidor, TX	31 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Odebolt Specialty Care	Odebolt, IA	31 FTE
NAT-SIZE	South Dakota	Washington, DC	31 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Plaza	Annandale, VA	31 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.