Companion services for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities · Connecticut

Hartford Human Service

Hartford, CT · ~111 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hartford Human Service runs at 140% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Companion services for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Hartford Human Service: 5.3 TCR = 140% of Companion services for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hartford Human Service safety composite

Hartford Human Service scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Hartford Human Service held a steady TCR band

Hartford Human Service's TCR held near 0.1 from 5.0 in 2016 to 4.9 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 7.5 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.61× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.0 · 2017=2.1 · 2018=7.5 · 2019=7.2 · 2020=4.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624120 · Hartford, CT ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.3 · 140% of ind

  • DART 3.3 DART
  • RANK #20/31
  • PHOTO FH
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 23 inj
  • SIZE ~111 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: FH (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

Hartford Human Service in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hartford Human Service averages 5.3 TCR (140% of the Companion services for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hartford Human Service TCR series: 2016=5 · 2017=2.1 · 2018=7.5 · 2019=7.2 · 2020=4.9 · BLS 3.8

Where Hartford Human Service falls in its industry

1,320 Companion services for disable establishments

Safer than 41% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #20 safest of 31 Companion services for disable employers in Connecticut.

Hartford Human Service (111 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Hartford Human Service
Hartford Human Service (111 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Hartford Human Service has more employees than the Companion services for disabled persons, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 4.9 3.3 3 0 0
2019 7.2 7.2 5 0 0
2018 7.5 7.5 6 0 0
2017 2.1 2.1 2 0 0
2016 5.0 5.0 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624120 · CT · Hartford

1,320 Companion services for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 270 employers in Hartford, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR FH 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Trivium Life Services Onawa 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Caruth Bldg Lecanto, FL 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tri-Main 5.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE John J Brennan Construction Co., Inc 111 FTE
STATE-SIZE BT Cromwell 111 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nutmeg Container Corporation 111 FTE
STATE-SIZE Imperial Electronic Assemly, Inc. 111 FTE
CITY-NEAR HARTFORD HOSPITAL 7,842 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Francis Hospital 4,674 FTE
CITY-NEAR LAZ Parking California, LLC 4,117 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hartford-Saint Francis Hospital 3,165 FTE
NAT-TCR Ross store 1280 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Ross store 531 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Ross store 1948 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Garelick Largo 5.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE 778 North Bergen, Nj 111 FTE
NAT-SIZE 3 Braintree, Ma 111 FTE
NAT-SIZE 429 Glen Oaks, Ny 111 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1081 Bronx, Ny 111 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.