Building cleaning services, janitorial · New Jersey

Harvard Miantenenace Inc. of New Jersey

Iselin, NJ · ~81 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.2
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Harvard Miantenenace Inc. of New Jersey runs at 93% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Building cleaning services, janitorial workplace, earning a grade C.

Harvard Miantenenace Inc. of New Jersey: 4.2 TCR = 93% of Building cleaning services, janitorial BLS 4.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Harvard Miantenenace Inc. of New Jersey safety composite

Harvard Miantenenace Inc. of New Jersey scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.4

2016→2021

Harvard Miantenenace Inc. of New Jersey injury rate improved

Harvard Miantenenace Inc. of New Jersey's TCR fell 1.4 from 5.8 in 2016 to 4.4 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 6.4 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.8 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=5.3 · 2019=3.1 · 2020=6.4 · 2021=4.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561720 · Iselin, NJ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 4.2 · 93% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #66/101
  • PHOTO San Antonio Airport
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~81 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: San Antonio Airport (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Harvard Miantenenace Inc. of New Jersey in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Harvard Miantenenace Inc. of New Jersey averages 4.2 TCR (93% of the Building cleaning services, janitorial BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Harvard Miantenenace Inc. of New Jersey TCR series: 2016=5.8 · 2017=0 · 2018=5.3 · 2019=3.1 · 2020=6.4 · 2021=4.4 · BLS 4.5

Where Harvard Miantenenace Inc. of New Jersey falls in its industry

4,064 Building cleaning services, ja establishments

Safer than 38% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #66 safest of 101 Building cleaning services, ja employers in New Jersey.

Harvard Miantenenace Inc. of New Jersey (81 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Harvard Miantenenace Inc. of New Jersey
Harvard Miantenenace Inc. of New Jersey (81 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Harvard Miantenenace Inc. of New Jersey has more employees than the Building cleaning services, janitorial median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 4.4 0.0 1 0 0
2020 6.4 6.4 1 0 0
2019 3.1 3.1 1 0 0
2018 5.3 4.0 4 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 5.8 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561720 · NJ · Iselin

4,064 Building cleaning services, janitorial employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 20 employers in Iselin, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR San Antonio Airport 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Clean Tech at Creve Coeur Center 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR NY 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR County of Los Angeles Custodial 4.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Raritan-Millstone/Canal Road Water Treatment Plant 81 FTE
STATE-SIZE New Jersey American Water-RM/Canal Road 81 FTE
STATE-SIZE Conti Solar 81 FTE
STATE-SIZE Old Fashioned Kitchen 81 FTE
CITY-NEAR USA - Iselin, S Wood 454 FTE
CITY-NEAR Metropark Facility 304 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2636-NEW JERSEY.ISELIN 271 FTE
CITY-NEAR Harvard Services Group of NJ 230 FTE
NAT-TCR FedEx Supply Chain - HP Facility LaVergne, TN 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Bob and Susan Vanella 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Kingsland Public Schools 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR OKC Lid Plant 4.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Welch Packaging Marion 81 FTE
NAT-SIZE Americold East Point, GA 81 FTE
NAT-SIZE Swanton Health Care & Retirement Center 81 FTE
NAT-SIZE ABC Hyundai 81 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.