Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Washington

Harvard Park

Spokane, WA · ~29 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Harvard Park runs at 23% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade A.

Harvard Park: 0.9 TCR = 23% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Harvard Park safety composite

Harvard Park scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 99% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

82/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 99% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Harvard Park held a steady TCR band

Harvard Park's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 5.2 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=5.2 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Spokane, WA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 23% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/216
  • PHOTO Spencer Place
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Spencer Place (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Harvard Park in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Harvard Park averages 0.9 TCR (23% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Harvard Park TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=5.2 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Harvard Park falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 99% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 216 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Washington.

Harvard Park (29 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Harvard Park
Harvard Park (29 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Harvard Park has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 5.2 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · WA · Spokane

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 551 employers in Spokane, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Spencer Place 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR White Springs Senior Living by Spring Arbor 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR LACOUR HOUSE 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sierra Hills 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Griffin Creek Farm 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE DG ORCHARDS LLC 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Frenchman Hills 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Consolidated Fruit, LLC 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2252-00000345 6,769 FTE
CITY-NEAR WA642 SACRED HEART MEDICAL CENTER-SPOKANE HR 5,062 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - GEG1 2,476 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Spokane 2,451 FTE
NAT-TCR Dow Louisville. (SMRU0847) 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR PCI San Diego Interior 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR PCI Portland Interior 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 4607 - Sela 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Massey Services #88 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pogo MC Payroll 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gresham Manor 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Averett Univ Cafe* 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.