Building cleaning services, janitorial · Florida

Harvard Services Group of Florida

Fort Lauderdale, FL · ~64 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Harvard Services Group of Florida runs at 30% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Building cleaning services, janitorial workplace, earning a grade A.

Harvard Services Group of Florida: 1.4 TCR = 30% of Building cleaning services, janitorial BLS 4.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Harvard Services Group of Florida safety composite

Harvard Services Group of Florida scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Harvard Services Group of Florida held a steady TCR band

Harvard Services Group of Florida's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 5.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=2.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=4.3 · 2021=5.9 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561720 · Fort Lauderdale, FL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.4 · 30% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #35/292
  • PHOTO Rags Brooms & Mops INC
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~64 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Rags Brooms & Mops INC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Harvard Services Group of Florida in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Harvard Services Group of Florida averages 1.4 TCR (30% of the Building cleaning services, janitorial BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Harvard Services Group of Florida TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=2 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=4.3 · 2021=5.9 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Harvard Services Group of Florida falls in its industry

4,064 Building cleaning services, ja establishments

Safer than 84% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #35 safest of 292 Building cleaning services, ja employers in Florida.

Harvard Services Group of Florida (64 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Harvard Services Group of Florida
Harvard Services Group of Florida (64 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Harvard Services Group of Florida has more employees than the Building cleaning services, janitorial median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 5.9 5.9 2 0 0
2020 4.3 2.1 2 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 2.0 2.0 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561720 · FL · Fort Lauderdale

4,064 Building cleaning services, janitorial employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 374 employers in Fort Lauderdale, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Rags Brooms & Mops INC 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR CCS Wisconsin Janitorial Inc 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Indian Path Medical Center 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR PSSI - 0285 HEB Meat Plant 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE AIREKO ENERGY SOLUTIONS US LLC 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Golden Gate Service Center 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE Florida Division - Orlando 64 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Hill Group 64 FTE
CITY-NEAR Spirit Airlines - FLL 3,426 FTE
CITY-NEAR Holy Cross Long Term Care Inc 2,979 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fort Lauderdale (FLL) 2,703 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hotwire Communications - Cypress 953 FTE
NAT-TCR Precision Strip, Inc. Minster 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Royal Oak. 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Emerald Electrical Contractors, Inc. 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Winder 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE BMR2 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Scotchman Industries, Inc 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sulphur,LA 64 FTE
NAT-SIZE PhilCorr LLC 64 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.