Job stampings, automotive, metal, manufacturing · Tennessee

Hatch Stamping Company - Chattanooga

Chattanooga, TN · ~132 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hatch Stamping Company - Chattanooga runs at 29% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Job stampings, automotive, metal, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Hatch Stamping Company - Chattanooga: 1.6 TCR = 29% of Job stampings, automotive, metal, manufacturing BLS 5.4 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hatch Stamping Company - Chattanooga safety composite

Hatch Stamping Company - Chattanooga scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.0

2022→2024

Hatch Stamping Company - Chattanooga injury rate improved

Hatch Stamping Company - Chattanooga's TCR fell 1.0 from 1.9 in 2022 to 0.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 1.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.56× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=1.9 · 2023=1.9 · 2024=0.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336370 · Chattanooga, TN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.6 · 29% of ind

  • DART 0.9 DART
  • RANK #5/39
  • PHOTO ArcelorMittal Tailor…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~132 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ArcelorMittal Tailored Blanks Detroit (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Hatch Stamping Company - Chattanooga in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hatch Stamping Company - Chattanooga averages 1.6 TCR (29% of the Job stampings, automotive, metal, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hatch Stamping Company - Chattanooga TCR series: 2022=1.9 · 2023=1.9 · 2024=0.9 · BLS 5.4

Where Hatch Stamping Company - Chattanooga falls in its industry

510 Job stampings, automotive, met establishments

Safer than 92% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 39 Job stampings, automotive, met employers in Tennessee.

Hatch Stamping Company - Chattanooga (132 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 145 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 024681012 Average employees Total Case Rate Hatch Stamping Company - Chattanooga
Hatch Stamping Company - Chattanooga (132 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 145 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Hatch Stamping Company - Chattanooga has fewer employees than the Job stampings, automotive, metal, manufa median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.9 0.9 1 0 0
2023 1.9 0.0 2 0 0
2022 1.9 1.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336370 · TN · Chattanooga

510 Job stampings, automotive, metal, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 695 employers in Chattanooga, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ArcelorMittal Tailored Blanks Detroit 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Owl Vans LLC 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Maxion Wheels Akron Operations 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Takumi Stamping Inc 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Public Utility 132 FTE
STATE-SIZE Consolidated Utility District of Rutherford County 132 FTE
STATE-SIZE Henkels & McCoy, Tennessee - Chattanooga 132 FTE
STATE-SIZE HVAC, Inc. 132 FTE
CITY-NEAR CHATTANOOGA COKE 8,650 FTE
CITY-NEAR CHATTANOOGA FOOD 8,650 FTE
CITY-NEAR USXpress 7,385 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cardiology GB 6,606 FTE
NAT-TCR Houston Products Processing, Inc. (dba HPP Corp) 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Alliant Technologies 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Bullseye Leak Detection, Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 3407 - Moscow West Pullman Road 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pratt Retail Specialties, LLC Vandalia, OH 132 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wilderness At the Lake 132 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Home at Hearthstone 132 FTE
NAT-SIZE Main Office - 01 132 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.