Electrical contractors · Pennsylvania

Hatzel & Buehler Inc. - Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh, PA · ~105 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hatzel & Buehler Inc. - Pittsburgh runs at 32% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Electrical contractors workplace, earning a grade A.

Hatzel & Buehler Inc. - Pittsburgh: 0.9 TCR = 32% of Electrical contractors BLS 2.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hatzel & Buehler Inc. - Pittsburgh safety composite

Hatzel & Buehler Inc. - Pittsburgh scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Hatzel & Buehler Inc. - Pittsburgh held a steady TCR band

Hatzel & Buehler Inc. - Pittsburgh's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2021 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 2.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=0.0 · 2022=2.8 · 2023=0.8 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238210 · Pittsburgh, PA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 32% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #27/191
  • PHOTO Lauderdale Electric
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~105 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lauderdale Electric (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Hatzel & Buehler Inc. - Pittsburgh in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hatzel & Buehler Inc. - Pittsburgh averages 0.9 TCR (32% of the Electrical contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hatzel & Buehler Inc. - Pittsburgh TCR series: 2021=0 · 2022=2.8 · 2023=0.8 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Hatzel & Buehler Inc. - Pittsburgh falls in its industry

4,550 Electrical contractors establishments

Safer than 83% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #27 safest of 191 Electrical contractors employers in Pennsylvania.

Hatzel & Buehler Inc. - Pittsburgh (105 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Hatzel & Buehler Inc. - Pittsburgh
Hatzel & Buehler Inc. - Pittsburgh (105 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Hatzel & Buehler Inc. - Pittsburgh has more employees than the Electrical contractors median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.8 0.0 1 0 0
2022 2.8 0.7 4 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238210 · PA · Pittsburgh

4,550 Electrical contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 1,170 employers in Pittsburgh, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lauderdale Electric 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR TransCore - T0152 - Ashburn 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pieper Houston Electric, LP 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR EMS Technologies, LLC 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Allied Power Services - Exelon, Limerick Station 105 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lehigh Valley Site Contractors 105 FTE
STATE-SIZE DDP Roofing Services Inc. 105 FTE
STATE-SIZE G.R. Noto Electrical Construction, Inc. 105 FTE
CITY-NEAR United States Steel COrporation 15,229 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Pittsburgh- Oakland 14,135 FTE
CITY-NEAR UPMC Presbyterian Shadyside (PUH) 13,900 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Pittsburgh-Oakland 13,208 FTE
NAT-TCR Altium Packaging - Samuelson 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Mueller Company - Cleveland TN 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR CT01-NEW-NEWTOWN 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Saint-Gobain Hycomp LLC 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cardinal Civil Contracting NC, LLC 105 FTE
NAT-SIZE E & B PAVING LLC - Bridge 105 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southland Insulators of DE LLC 105 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lins Hurricane 105 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.