Relief services, emergency · Massachusetts

Haverhill Emergency Services

Haverhill, MA · ~37 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Haverhill Emergency Services runs at 32% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Relief services, emergency workplace, earning a grade A.

Haverhill Emergency Services: 1.2 TCR = 32% of Relief services, emergency BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Haverhill Emergency Services safety composite

Haverhill Emergency Services scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.7

2016→2023

Haverhill Emergency Services injury rate improved

Haverhill Emergency Services's TCR fell 4.7 from 4.7 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 5.2 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.7 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=5.2 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624230 · Haverhill, MA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.2 · 32% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/5
  • PHOTO AMERICAN RED CROSS -…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~37 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: AMERICAN RED CROSS - 514 W 49TH ST (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Haverhill Emergency Services in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Haverhill Emergency Services averages 1.2 TCR (32% of the Relief services, emergency BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Haverhill Emergency Services TCR series: 2016=4.7 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=5.2 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Haverhill Emergency Services falls in its industry

86 Relief services, emergency establishments

Safer than 86% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 5 Relief services, emergency employers in Massachusetts.

Haverhill Emergency Services (37 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 3.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Haverhill Emergency Services
Haverhill Emergency Services (37 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 3.7

Haverhill Emergency Services has fewer employees than the Relief services, emergency median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 5.2 0.0 0 1 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 4.7 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624230 · MA · Haverhill

86 Relief services, emergency employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 87 employers in Haverhill, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR AMERICAN RED CROSS - 514 W 49TH ST 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 8-koi, Inc. El Paso 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR AMERICAN RED CROSS - 101 STATION LANDING 1.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR AMERICAN RED CROSS - 2055 KENDALL DR 1.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Town of Danvers, Electric Division 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE MIDDLESEX GASES & TECHNOLOGIES, INC 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Western Builders 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Core Concepts Inc. 37 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cedars Mediterranean Foods 1,033 FTE
CITY-NEAR Brooks Brothers Group - Southwick 501 FTE
CITY-NEAR Market Basket #09 459 FTE
CITY-NEAR Market Basket #9 371 FTE
NAT-TCR JBT AeroTech Corporation Airport Services HNL 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR PW-Environment & Energy 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Compassus Greater New Jersey Parsippany 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR SII West Point 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE SNL Distribution Services Corp-Tyler 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Richland Office 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Northern Bay Resort 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Friendship Home of Lincoln 37 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.