Government base facilities operation support services · Hawaii

Hawaii DOT, Highways Division

Honolulu, HI · ~830 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hawaii DOT, Highways Division runs at 108% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Government base facilities operation support services workplace, earning a grade C.

Hawaii DOT, Highways Division: 2.8 TCR = 108% of Government base facilities operation support services BLS 2.6 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hawaii DOT, Highways Division safety composite

Hawaii DOT, Highways Division scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.6

2018→2022

Hawaii DOT, Highways Division injury rate improved

Hawaii DOT, Highways Division's TCR fell 1.6 from 3.6 in 2018 to 2.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 3.6 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.71× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=3.6 · 2019=2.6 · 2020=2.6 · 2021=3.4 · 2022=2.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561210 · Honolulu, HI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 2.8 · 108% of ind

  • DART 2.0 DART
  • RANK #3/4
  • PHOTO SODEXO AT WASHINGTON…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 97 inj
  • SIZE ~830 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SODEXO AT WASHINGTON COMMUNITY FAC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Hawaii employers → · Look up another →

Hawaii DOT, Highways Division in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hawaii DOT, Highways Division averages 2.8 TCR (108% of the Government base facilities operation support services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hawaii DOT, Highways Division TCR series: 2018=3.6 · 2019=2.6 · 2020=2.6 · 2021=3.4 · 2022=2 · BLS 2.6

Where Hawaii DOT, Highways Division falls in its industry

757 Government base facilities ope establishments

Safer than 50% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Hawaii alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 4 Government base facilities ope employers in Hawaii.

Hawaii DOT, Highways Division (830 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Hawaii DOT, Highways Division
Hawaii DOT, Highways Division (830 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.9

Hawaii DOT, Highways Division has more employees than the Government base facilities operation sup median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 2.0 2.0 16 0 0
2021 3.4 1.7 23 3 0
2020 2.6 1.8 15 4 0
2019 2.6 2.4 18 3 0
2018 3.6 1.7 25 4 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561210 · HI · Honolulu

757 Government base facilities operation support services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,022 rated employers in Hawaii with headcount on file · 796 employers in Honolulu, HI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT WASHINGTON COMMUNITY FAC 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ft. Bragg O&M 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR TAMU PV Mn 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT NAZARETH EDUCATION SSF 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Nan, Inc. 823 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hawaii Pacific University 837 FTE
STATE-SIZE Blaisdell Concert Hall 861 FTE
STATE-SIZE 14375 YMCA OF HONOLULU 794 FTE
CITY-NEAR 9095-HNL 5,861 FTE
CITY-NEAR HNL HONOLULUL 4,589 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hawaiian Airlines - HNL 4,118 FTE
CITY-NEAR 12812007 MOANALUA MEDICAL OFFICES 2,355 FTE
NAT-TCR Hendersonville Family Health Center 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Ncngs - Charlotte 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Utica General Peterbilt - Utica 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR McAninch Corporation 2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE College Point 830 FTE
NAT-SIZE Zoetis - Lincoln, NE 830 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chobani NY Plant 830 FTE
NAT-SIZE Njbou - Bound Brook 830 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.