Printing, flexographic (except books, grey goods) · Ohio

Hawks & Associates, Inc.

Cincinnati, OH · ~47 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hawks & Associates, Inc. runs at 54% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Printing, flexographic (except books, grey goods) workplace, earning a grade B.

Hawks & Associates, Inc.: 1.8 TCR = 54% of Printing, flexographic (except books, grey goods) BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hawks & Associates, Inc. safety composite

Hawks & Associates, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.0

2016→2024

Hawks & Associates, Inc. injury rate improved

Hawks & Associates, Inc.'s TCR fell 6.0 from 6.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 6.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.0 · 2017=2.0 · 2018=4.0 · 2019=4.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 323111 · Cincinnati, OH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.8 · 54% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #67/138
  • PHOTO CCL Design Brunswick
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~47 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CCL Design Brunswick (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Hawks & Associates, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hawks & Associates, Inc. averages 1.8 TCR (54% of the Printing, flexographic (except books, grey goods) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hawks & Associates, Inc. TCR series: 2016=6 · 2017=2 · 2018=4 · 2019=4 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Hawks & Associates, Inc. falls in its industry

2,001 Printing, flexographic (except establishments

Safer than 69% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #67 safest of 138 Printing, flexographic (except employers in Ohio.

Hawks & Associates, Inc. (47 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Hawks & Associates, Inc.
Hawks & Associates, Inc. (47 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Hawks & Associates, Inc. has fewer employees than the Printing, flexographic (except books, gr median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 4.0 4.0 2 0 0
2018 4.0 2.0 2 0 0
2017 2.0 0.0 1 0 0
2016 6.0 4.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

323111 · OH · Cincinnati

2,001 Printing, flexographic (except books, grey goods) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 1,513 employers in Cincinnati, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CCL Design Brunswick 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6711 Lexington 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amcor Shelbyville Liquids 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR LSC Communications Strasburg Division 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Gerber Farm Division 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE MDP Acquisition LLC 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Potemkin Industries, Inc. 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE 259-NiSource-Springfield OH 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center 17,011 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cincinnati Operations 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain : Evendale, OH 7,118 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain Evendale OH 6,400 FTE
NAT-TCR Store #39 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Ajinomoto Animal Nutrition North America, Inc. 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Monical's Pizza Washington 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Tindall Corporation - Mississippi Division 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pioneer College Caterers, Inc. - Unit 026/Chowan University 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE F.I.R.M. Inc. 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Store #19 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Menasha Packaging Company - Muscatine 47 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.