Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · North Carolina

Hayesville House

Hayesville, NC · ~37 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hayesville House runs at 138% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Hayesville House: 5.2 TCR = 138% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hayesville House safety composite

Hayesville House scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 5.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.3

2016→2024

Hayesville House injury rate improved

Hayesville House's TCR fell 5.3 from 5.3 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 11.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.3 · 2017=11.4 · 2018=8.2 · 2019=5.6 · 2020=9.8 · 2021=3.5 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=3.2 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Hayesville, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.2 · 138% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #150/356
  • PHOTO Sydney Creek
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~37 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sydney Creek (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Hayesville House in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hayesville House averages 5.2 TCR (138% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hayesville House TCR series: 2016=5.3 · 2017=11.4 · 2018=8.2 · 2019=5.6 · 2020=9.8 · 2021=3.5 · 2022=0 · 2023=3.2 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Hayesville House falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 66% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #150 safest of 356 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in North Carolina.

Hayesville House (37 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Hayesville House
Hayesville House (37 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Hayesville House has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 3.2 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 3.5 0.0 1 0 0
2020 9.8 0.0 3 0 0
2019 5.6 2.8 2 0 0
2018 8.2 8.2 3 0 0
2017 11.4 2.9 4 0 0
2016 5.3 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · NC · Hayesville

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 9 employers in Hayesville, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sydney Creek 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Shadowlake 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2248-63117 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bridges by Epoch at Trumbull 5.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE CAR Greenhouse LLC 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Statesville Breeders 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dan River CT/CC 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE hep Petra, LLC 37 FTE
CITY-NEAR Clay County Schools 197 FTE
CITY-NEAR Store 116 169 FTE
CITY-NEAR Clay County Care Center 68 FTE
CITY-NEAR CCI- Hayesville Plant 57 FTE
NAT-TCR Flowers Bakery of Suwanee 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Basin Western, Inc. 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR L. G. Pike Construction CO Inc 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR A-1 Scaffold Mfg., Inc. 5.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Dekalb Tool & Die, Inc. 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dayton Construction Company, Inc. 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Peterbilt of Michigan, Inc. - Kalamazoo 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Vps-Ground Ops 37 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.