Windows and window frames, vinyl, manufacturing · Minnesota

Hayfield Window and Door

Hayfield, MN · ~182 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hayfield Window and Door runs at 392% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Windows and window frames, vinyl, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Hayfield Window and Door: 12.9 TCR = 392% of Windows and window frames, vinyl, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hayfield Window and Door safety composite

Hayfield Window and Door scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

16/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.7

2021→2024

Hayfield Window and Door injury rate improved

Hayfield Window and Door's TCR fell 1.7 from 14.3 in 2021 to 12.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 14.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.62× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=14.3 · 2022=11.7 · 2023=13.0 · 2024=12.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326199 · Hayfield, MN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 12.9 · 392% of ind

  • DART 8.1 DART
  • RANK #86/89
  • PHOTO Molded Plastics Indu…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 87 inj
  • SIZE ~182 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Molded Plastics Industries, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Hayfield Window and Door in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hayfield Window and Door averages 12.9 TCR (392% of the Windows and window frames, vinyl, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hayfield Window and Door TCR series: 2021=14.3 · 2022=11.7 · 2023=13 · 2024=12.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Hayfield Window and Door falls in its industry

2,838 Windows and window frames, vin establishments

Safer than 3% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #86 safest of 89 Windows and window frames, vin employers in Minnesota.

Hayfield Window and Door (182 employees, TCR 12.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Hayfield Window and Door
Hayfield Window and Door (182 employees, TCR 12.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Hayfield Window and Door has more employees than the Windows and window frames, vinyl, manufa median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 12.7 8.1 19 3 0
2023 13.0 7.9 22 1 0
2022 11.7 7.1 22 1 0
2021 14.3 6.4 24 5 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326199 · MN · Hayfield

2,838 Windows and window frames, vinyl, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 7 employers in Hayfield, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Molded Plastics Industries, LLC 12.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR eccore Internatonal - Ozark 13.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hedstrom Plastics LLC 13.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Elkhart Plastics 13.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Gilbert Mechanical Contractors, Inc. 182 FTE
STATE-SIZE Form A Feed Stewart 182 FTE
STATE-SIZE Minnesota Corrugated Box, Inc. 182 FTE
STATE-SIZE Taylor Print and Visual Impressions - Byron MN - 0223-MNBY1 182 FTE
CITY-NEAR IND SCHOOL DISTRICT #203 115 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hayfield Public Schools 101 FTE
CITY-NEAR Field Crest Care Center 92 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mike's Full Lawn Service, Inc. 48 FTE
NAT-TCR Quincy Village 12.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Dickson Health & Rehab 12.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Goodwill CFL - Lake Nona 12.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Evergreen Place Supportive Living- Streator 12.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pioneer Frozen Foods 182 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bella Care Hospice 182 FTE
NAT-SIZE Paramount Senior Living at Chambersburg Road 182 FTE
NAT-SIZE COH Parks and Recreation Admin 182 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.