Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · South Carolina

Haywood Estates

Name: Haywood Estates Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Greenville, SC · ~23 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

D
Poor Safety Record: 6.2
Avg TCR: 3.8
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Haywood Estates runs at 162% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Haywood Estates: 6.2 TCR = 162% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Haywood Estates safety composite

Haywood Estates scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 59% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 22%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): C 6.15 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers
DART rate: F 7.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Haywood Estates: 0.0 → 23.1 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 23.1 TCR · DART/TCR 1.25× in 2022

Haywood Estates's TCR rose 23.1 from 0.0 in 2017 to 23.1 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 1.25× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Greenville, SC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.2 · 162% of ind

DART 7.7 DART
RANK #42/107
PHOTO 10683
BOOK 6y book
INJ 5 inj
SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 10683 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

This site

6.2
10683

6.2
Genacross Hous

6.2
2248-63041

6.2
Wexford House

6.2

What this shows Haywood Estates averages 6.2 TCR (162% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Haywood Estates TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=13.8 · 2022=23.1 · BLS 3.8

Where Haywood Estates falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 59% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

Grade D

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #42 safest of 107 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in South Carolina.

Haywood Estates (23 employees, TCR 6.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Haywood Estates has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries
2022	23.1	7.7	3
2021	13.8	13.8	2
2020	0.0	0.0	0
2019	0.0	0.0	0
2018	0.0	0.0	0
2017	0.0	0.0	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · SC · Greenville

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 573 employers in Greenville, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	10683	LAFAYETTE HILL, PA	6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Genacross Housing	TOLEDO, OH	6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR	2248-63041	ANNAPOLIS, MD	6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Wexford House	DENVER, NC	6.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE	TRI COUNTY COTTON GROWERS, LLC	SALTERS	23 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Hartsville Complex	HARTSVILLE	23 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Marlboro Electric Cooperative, Inc.	BENNETTSVILLE	23 FTE
STATE-SIZE	BLYTHEWOOD CREW QUARTERS	BLYTHEWOOD	23 FTE
CITY-NEAR	GREENVILLE MEMORIAL MED CAMPUS	Greenville	6,132 FTE
CITY-NEAR	St Francis Health System	Greenville	3,395 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Gas Power Systems : Greenville, SC, USA	Greenville	2,971 FTE
CITY-NEAR	GSC : Greenville, SC, USA	Greenville	2,673 FTE
NAT-TCR	West Michigan 38660	Portage, MI	6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR	6458-ZEMP	Emporia, VA	6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR	6458-ZMOT	Montgomery, NY	6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR	6458-ZNFK	Norfolk, NE	6.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Indiana Packers	Delphi, IN	23 FTE
NAT-SIZE	E Michigan U - SC Starbucks	Ypsilanti, MI	23 FTE
NAT-SIZE	MS-Cafe 37*	Redmond, WA	23 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Bridgeport Distribution	Tacoma, WA	23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.