Bonded warehousing, general merchandise · Missouri

Hazelwood

Hazelwood, MO · ~193 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.3
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hazelwood runs at 22% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Bonded warehousing, general merchandise workplace, earning a grade A.

Hazelwood: 1.3 TCR = 22% of Bonded warehousing, general merchandise BLS 5.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hazelwood safety composite

Hazelwood scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.3

2016→2024

Hazelwood injury rate improved

Hazelwood's TCR fell 2.3 from 2.3 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 4.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.3 · 2017=4.8 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.5 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.7 · 2023=3.1 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Hazelwood, MO AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.3 · 22% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #26/179
  • PHOTO Fort Worth Touchston…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~193 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Fort Worth Touchstone Wireless Repair and Logistics, LP (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

Hazelwood in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hazelwood averages 1.3 TCR (22% of the Bonded warehousing, general merchandise BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hazelwood TCR series: 2016=2.3 · 2017=4.8 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0.5 · 2021=0 · 2022=0.7 · 2023=3.1 · 2024=0 · BLS 5.8

Where Hazelwood falls in its industry

9,477 Bonded warehousing, general me establishments

Safer than 85% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #26 safest of 179 Bonded warehousing, general me employers in Missouri.

Hazelwood (193 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Hazelwood
Hazelwood (193 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Hazelwood has more employees than the Bonded warehousing, general merchandise median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 3.1 3.1 6 0 0
2022 0.7 0.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.5 0.0 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 4.8 1.8 8 0 0
2016 2.3 0.8 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · MO · Hazelwood

9,477 Bonded warehousing, general merchandise employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 106 employers in Hazelwood, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Fort Worth Touchstone Wireless Repair and Logistics, LP 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Holman Logistics International 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Aero Fulfillment Services/Fairfield 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR The J.M. Smucker Company Topeka Distribution Center 1.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Overhead Door Company of St. Louis 193 FTE
STATE-SIZE 12 - Kansas City Front. Street Plant 193 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pretium Packaging - St. Louis (Alpha Packaging) 193 FTE
STATE-SIZE WireCo WorldGroup Sedalia 193 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon Transportation Services : STL5 1,215 FTE
CITY-NEAR AMZL : DLI1 969 FTE
CITY-NEAR bioMerieux Inc. 960 FTE
CITY-NEAR bioMerieux St. Louis 871 FTE
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Disneyland Harbor Point Starbu 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Fanatics - Linebaugh 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR George Hotel 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Giorgio Fresh 2 1.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE MDA 193 FTE
NAT-SIZE Vendors Exchange International INC. 193 FTE
NAT-SIZE Harris Pacific Northwest, LLC 193 FTE
NAT-SIZE US02 Laurens Link Snacks, Inc. 193 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.