Warehousing and storage, general merchandise · Pennsylvania

Hazleton Distribution Center

Hazle Township, PA · ~972 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.8
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hazleton Distribution Center runs at 48% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Warehousing and storage, general merchandise workplace, earning a grade A.

Hazleton Distribution Center: 2.8 TCR = 48% of Warehousing and storage, general merchandise BLS 5.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hazleton Distribution Center safety composite

Hazleton Distribution Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 59% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 46%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Hazleton Distribution Center: 1.9 → 2.7 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 4.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.89× in 2024

Hazleton Distribution Center's TCR rose 0.9 from 1.9 in 2016 to 2.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 4.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.89× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Hazle Township, PA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 2.8 · 48% of ind

  • DART 2.5 DART
  • RANK #231/650
  • PHOTO DC 99 - Shawnee
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 188 inj
  • SIZE ~972 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: DC 99 - Shawnee (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Hazleton Distribution Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hazleton Distribution Center averages 2.8 TCR (48% of the Warehousing and storage, general merchandise BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hazleton Distribution Center TCR series: 2016=1.9 · 2017=2.1 · 2018=2.5 · 2019=3.7 · 2020=3.4 · 2021=4 · 2022=1.4 · 2023=3.2 · 2024=2.7 · BLS 5.8

Where Hazleton Distribution Center falls in its industry

9,477 Warehousing and storage, gener establishments

Safer than 59% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #231 safest of 650 Warehousing and storage, gener employers in Pennsylvania.

Hazleton Distribution Center (972 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Hazleton Distribution Center
Hazleton Distribution Center (972 employees, TCR 2.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Hazleton Distribution Center has more employees than the Warehousing and storage, general merchan median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.7 2.5 21 0 0
2023 3.2 3.1 23 0 0
2022 1.4 1.4 11 0 0
2021 4.0 4.0 31 0 0
2020 3.4 3.3 27 0 0
2019 3.7 2.9 31 0 0
2018 2.5 2.4 18 0 0
2017 2.1 1.9 14 0 0
2016 1.9 1.9 12 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · PA · Hazle Township

9,477 Warehousing and storage, general merchandise employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 36 employers in Hazle Township, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR DC 99 - Shawnee 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Johnson Controls- Park City Site Source 1 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR FC: houston 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pharmalink 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Johnson and Johnson Consumer Inc McNeil Consumer Healthcare Division PPC 971 FTE
STATE-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - ABE4 974 FTE
STATE-SIZE Delaware County Memorial Hospital 969 FTE
STATE-SIZE LEWISTOWN HOSPITAL 975 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Hershey Co Hazleton 701 FTE
CITY-NEAR 9720 633 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hershey - Hazleton Plant 533 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2255 419 FTE
NAT-TCR Shawano Feed/Energy 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Valdosta Ga 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR McAllen Center 2.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Quality Plastics and Engineering Acquisition Corporation 2.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE GNV 972 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - SBD3 972 FTE
NAT-SIZE Delta Air Lines - DFW 972 FTE
NAT-SIZE Discovery Cove (DCO) 972 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.