Animal fats (except poultry and small game) produced in slaughtering plants · Texas

H&B Packing Co. Inc

Waco, TX · ~142 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

H&B Packing Co. Inc runs at 129% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Animal fats (except poultry and small game) produced in slaughtering plants workplace, earning a grade D.

H&B Packing Co. Inc: 4.3 TCR = 129% of Animal fats (except poultry and small game) produced in slaughtering plants BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

H&B Packing Co. Inc safety composite

H&B Packing Co. Inc scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 61% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 55%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Fatalities
C 0

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.0

2017→2024

H&B Packing Co. Inc injury rate improved

H&B Packing Co. Inc's TCR fell 1.0 from 3.5 in 2017 to 2.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 10.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.59× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.5 · 2019=3.9 · 2020=4.3 · 2021=3.2 · 2022=2.4 · 2023=10.0 · 2024=2.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311611 · Waco, TX ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.3 · 129% of ind

  • DART 2.5 DART
  • RANK #13/19
  • PHOTO Grinds - Columbia SC
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 35 inj
  • SIZE ~142 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Grinds - Columbia SC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

H&B Packing Co. Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows H&B Packing Co. Inc averages 4.3 TCR (129% of the Animal fats (except poultry and small game) produced in slaughtering plants BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

H&B Packing Co. Inc TCR series: 2017=3.5 · 2019=3.9 · 2020=4.3 · 2021=3.2 · 2022=2.4 · 2023=10 · 2024=2.5 · BLS 3.3

Where H&B Packing Co. Inc falls in its industry

212 Animal fats (except poultry an establishments

Safer than 61% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 19 Animal fats (except poultry an employers in Texas.

H&B Packing Co. Inc (142 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 297 employees and a TCR of 5.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate H&B Packing Co. Inc
H&B Packing Co. Inc (142 employees, TCR 4.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 297 employees and a TCR of 5.3

H&B Packing Co. Inc has fewer employees than the Animal fats (except poultry and small ga median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.5 2.5 4 0 0
2023 10.0 10.0 2 0 0
2022 2.4 2.4 5 0 0
2021 3.2 3.2 6 0 0
2020 4.3 4.3 8 0 0
2019 3.9 2.8 5 2 0
2017 3.5 2.9 5 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311611 · TX · Waco

212 Animal fats (except poultry and small game) produced in slaughtering plants employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 314 employers in Waco, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Grinds - Columbia SC 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Smithfield 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Abbyland Foods, Inc 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sioux City Fabrication Plant 4.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Dallas Corporate Office 142 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brookshire Office 142 FTE
STATE-SIZE DPR Construction - Houston 142 FTE
STATE-SIZE PM Construction & Rehab LLC dba IPR - South Central 142 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baylor Scott & White Medical Center - Hillcrest 1,512 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - AUS3 1,468 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1855-TXWAC1 1,407 FTE
CITY-NEAR L3Harris AS IAS Waco 1,400 FTE
NAT-TCR RG&E Mushroom Blvd 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Aloft Dublin Pleasanton 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Acme Machell, Inc 4.3 TCR
NAT-TCR FDR Services Corp of Trenton 4.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Green Castle Recovery Centers, LLC 142 FTE
NAT-SIZE Android Bowling Green 142 FTE
NAT-SIZE Magline 142 FTE
NAT-SIZE Phoenix - West 142 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.