Heads (e.g., recording, read/write) manufacturing · California

Headway Technologies, Inc.

Milpitas, CA · ~762 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Headway Technologies, Inc. runs at 40% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Heads (e.g., recording, read/write) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Headway Technologies, Inc.: 1.3 TCR = 40% of Heads (e.g., recording, read/write) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Headway Technologies, Inc. safety composite

Headway Technologies, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 61% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 33%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Headway Technologies, Inc.: 0.8 → 1.8 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 2.3 TCR · DART/TCR 1.12× in 2024

Headway Technologies, Inc.'s TCR rose 1.0 from 0.8 in 2017 to 1.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 2.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.12× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334419 · Milpitas, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.3 · 40% of ind

  • DART 1.5 DART
  • RANK #17/48
  • PHOTO Richardson Electroni…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 79 inj
  • SIZE ~762 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Richardson Electronics, Ltd. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Headway Technologies, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Headway Technologies, Inc. averages 1.3 TCR (40% of the Heads (e.g., recording, read/write) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Headway Technologies, Inc. TCR series: 2017=0.8 · 2018=0.6 · 2019=0.8 · 2020=2.3 · 2021=1.2 · 2022=1.8 · 2023=1.3 · 2024=1.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Headway Technologies, Inc. falls in its industry

334 Heads (e.g., recording, read/w establishments

Safer than 61% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 48 Heads (e.g., recording, read/w employers in California.

Headway Technologies, Inc. (762 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 108 employees and a TCR of 1.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Headway Technologies, Inc.
Headway Technologies, Inc. (762 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 108 employees and a TCR of 1.8

Headway Technologies, Inc. has more employees than the Heads (e.g., recording, read/write) manu median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.8 1.5 12 0 0
2023 1.3 1.3 10 0 0
2022 1.8 1.7 16 0 0
2021 1.2 0.7 9 0 0
2020 2.3 2.0 16 0 0
2019 0.8 0.8 6 0 0
2018 0.6 0.6 4 0 0
2017 0.8 0.8 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334419 · CA · Milpitas

334 Heads (e.g., recording, read/write) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 161 employers in Milpitas, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Richardson Electronics, Ltd. 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR NAVITAS SYSTEMS VENTURE 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR PCS Naperville 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR EWHMIB 1.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - LGB4 762 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sutter Valley Hospitals (30095) 762 FTE
STATE-SIZE Alpine Meadows Ski Resort 762 FTE
STATE-SIZE California Department of Transportation Facility 160 764 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 454 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR California 2,531 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2636-CALIFORNIA, MILPITAS 2,400 FTE
CITY-NEAR 011 SanDisk HQ 1,952 FTE
NAT-TCR City of Sebeka 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Bus Public Transportation 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR PLANT 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Darling Ingredients 1.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Orthofix US LLC 762 FTE
NAT-SIZE Alton Memorial Hospital 762 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hoskins Center 762 FTE
NAT-SIZE Plateau Excavation, Inc 762 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.