Hospitals, general medical and surgical · California

Healdsburg District Hospital

Healdsburg, CA · ~319 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
4.9
Avg TCR
7.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Healdsburg District Hospital runs at 65% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Hospitals, general medical and surgical workplace, earning a grade B.

Healdsburg District Hospital: 4.9 TCR = 65% of Hospitals, general medical and surgical BLS 7.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Healdsburg District Hospital safety composite

Healdsburg District Hospital scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 62% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.0

2017→2018

Healdsburg District Hospital injury rate improved

Healdsburg District Hospital's TCR fell 4.0 from 6.9 in 2017 to 2.9 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 6.9 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.25× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=6.9 · 2018=2.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 622110 · Healdsburg, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 4.9 · 65% of ind

  • DART 1.2 DART
  • RANK #172/662
  • PHOTO AdventHealth Manches…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~319 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: AdventHealth Manchester (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Healdsburg District Hospital in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Healdsburg District Hospital averages 4.9 TCR (65% of the Hospitals, general medical and surgical BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Healdsburg District Hospital TCR series: 2017=6.9 · 2018=2.9 · BLS 7.5

Where Healdsburg District Hospital falls in its industry

6,862 Hospitals, general medical and establishments

Safer than 54% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #172 safest of 662 Hospitals, general medical and employers in California.

Healdsburg District Hospital (319 employees, TCR 4.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Healdsburg District Hospital
Healdsburg District Hospital (319 employees, TCR 4.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2

Healdsburg District Hospital has fewer employees than the Hospitals, general medical and surgical median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 2.9 1.2 7 0 0
2017 6.9 5.0 15 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

622110 · CA · Healdsburg

6,862 Hospitals, general medical and surgical employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 61 employers in Healdsburg, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR AdventHealth Manchester 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mount Sinai Beth Israel 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR ND,Fargo-South University Hospital-General Medical And Surgical Hospitals 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR TXAUS41 ASCENSION SETON MEDICAL CTR HAYS 4.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE T AND M AGRICULTURAL SERVICES LLC 319 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dragados USA West 319 FTE
STATE-SIZE E&J Gallo Winery 319 FTE
STATE-SIZE Monogram Aerospace Fasteners - Commerce 319 FTE
CITY-NEAR Montage North America, LLC 303 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA983 HEALDSBURG HOSPITAL HR 226 FTE
CITY-NEAR Klein Foods Inc. dba Rodney Strong Wine Estates 215 FTE
CITY-NEAR Healdsburg Site 151 FTE
NAT-TCR Heartland Health Care Center - Ft. Myers 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Charlottesville-Pupil Tran 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Supervalu Distribution Center - Fort Wayne 31111 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Al118-118-Homestead at Rochester 4.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sentara Nursing Center Norfolk 319 FTE
NAT-SIZE American Buildings Company South Division 319 FTE
NAT-SIZE Summers-Taylor, Inc. 319 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dallas - Fort Worth Airport (HR) 319 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.