Medical doctors' (MDs, except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) · Florida

Health First Medical Group

Melbourne, FL · ~1,787 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Health First Medical Group runs at 65% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Medical doctors' (MDs, except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) workplace, earning a grade B.

Health First Medical Group: 2.5 TCR = 65% of Medical doctors' (MDs, except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Health First Medical Group safety composite

Health First Medical Group scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 63% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.5

2018→2020

Health First Medical Group injury rate improved

Health First Medical Group's TCR fell 0.5 from 2.6 in 2018 to 2.2 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 2.6 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.18× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=2.6 · 2019=2.6 · 2020=2.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621111 · Melbourne, FL AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade B · TCR 2.5 · 65% of ind

  • DART 0.5 DART
  • RANK #48/76
  • PHOTO Family HealthCare Ne…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 116 inj
  • SIZE ~1,787 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Family HealthCare Network - Tulare Hillman (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Health First Medical Group in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Health First Medical Group averages 2.5 TCR (65% of the Medical doctors' (MDs, except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Health First Medical Group TCR series: 2018=2.6 · 2019=2.6 · 2020=2.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Health First Medical Group falls in its industry

2,836 Medical doctors' (MDs, except establishments

Safer than 63% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #48 safest of 76 Medical doctors' (MDs, except employers in Florida.

Health First Medical Group (1,787 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Health First Medical Group
Health First Medical Group (1,787 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Health First Medical Group has more employees than the Medical doctors' (MDs, except mental hea median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 2.2 0.5 34 0 0
2019 2.6 1.0 42 0 0
2018 2.6 0.9 40 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621111 · FL · Melbourne

2,836 Medical doctors' (MDs, except mental health) offices (e.g., centers, clinics) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 305 employers in Melbourne, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Family HealthCare Network - Tulare Hillman 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sutter Medical Foundation (185-312) 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR CHI St. Joseph Children's Health 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2053-MMG Uptown 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE The Haskell Company 1,793 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mary J Labyak Community Service Center 1,794 FTE
STATE-SIZE 158 MANATEE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, L.P.-MANATEE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 1,796 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hillsborough Hospice 1,777 FTE
CITY-NEAR NGAS-A458 4,719 FTE
CITY-NEAR HOLMES REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 2,725 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nextech HVACR 2,358 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rockwell Collins Inc (Melbourne FL) 1,706 FTE
NAT-TCR SFO 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Hoilday Inn Express 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR James R. Glidewell Dental Ceramics - FEDEX 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Strongwell_Chatfield 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Memorial Health System Main Campus 1,787 FTE
NAT-SIZE Whirlpool 1,787 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - DET6 1,787 FTE
NAT-SIZE Procter & Gamble Paper Products Company Mehoopany Plant 1,786 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.