Physical rehabilitation hospitals · Tennessee

HealthSouth Chattanooga Rehabilitation Hospital

Chattanooga, TN · ~175 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

HealthSouth Chattanooga Rehabilitation Hospital runs at 260% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Physical rehabilitation hospitals workplace, earning a grade F.

HealthSouth Chattanooga Rehabilitation Hospital: 9.9 TCR = 260% of Physical rehabilitation hospitals BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

HealthSouth Chattanooga Rehabilitation Hospital safety composite

HealthSouth Chattanooga Rehabilitation Hospital scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 62% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.9

2016→2017

HealthSouth Chattanooga Rehabilitation Hospital injury rate improved

HealthSouth Chattanooga Rehabilitation Hospital's TCR fell 4.9 from 12.3 in 2016 to 7.5 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 12.3 TCR. In 2017, DART was 0.17× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=12.3 · 2017=7.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 622310 · Chattanooga, TN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 9.9 · 260% of ind

  • DART 1.7 DART
  • RANK #37/41
  • PHOTO VIBRA HOSPITAL OF WE…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 23 inj
  • SIZE ~175 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: VIBRA HOSPITAL OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

HealthSouth Chattanooga Rehabilitation Hospital in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows HealthSouth Chattanooga Rehabilitation Hospital averages 9.9 TCR (260% of the Physical rehabilitation hospitals BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

HealthSouth Chattanooga Rehabilitation Hospital TCR series: 2016=12.3 · 2017=7.5 · BLS 3.8

Where HealthSouth Chattanooga Rehabilitation Hospital falls in its industry

1,390 Physical rehabilitation hospit establishments

Safer than 13% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #37 safest of 41 Physical rehabilitation hospit employers in Tennessee.

HealthSouth Chattanooga Rehabilitation Hospital (175 employees, TCR 9.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 160 employees and a TCR of 5.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate HealthSouth Chattanooga Rehabilitation Hospital
HealthSouth Chattanooga Rehabilitation Hospital (175 employees, TCR 9.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 160 employees and a TCR of 5.4

HealthSouth Chattanooga Rehabilitation Hospital has more employees than the Physical rehabilitation hospitals median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 7.5 1.7 8 1 0
2016 12.3 5.8 15 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

622310 · TN · Chattanooga

1,390 Physical rehabilitation hospitals employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 695 employers in Chattanooga, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR VIBRA HOSPITAL OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS 9.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rush Foundation Hospital 9.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Vibra Hospital of San Bernardino, LLC d/b/a Ballard Rehabilitation Hospital 9.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR HealthSouth Northern Kentucky 9.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE T.W. Frierson Contractor, Inc 175 FTE
STATE-SIZE Scapa Healthcare 175 FTE
STATE-SIZE Advanced Composites TN Plant 175 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pulaski 175 FTE
CITY-NEAR CHATTANOOGA COKE 8,650 FTE
CITY-NEAR CHATTANOOGA FOOD 8,650 FTE
CITY-NEAR USXpress 7,385 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cardiology GB 6,606 FTE
NAT-TCR Springdale (Arlow) 9.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Sea Level Seafoods 9.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 294 ABC Supply Co., Inc 9.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Umpqua Valley Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 9.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE GEHC : Arlington Heights IL, LS 175 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tri-City (Westville) (Inwes) 175 FTE
NAT-SIZE Santa Barbara (Castb) 175 FTE
NAT-SIZE Riverwood Health and Rehabilitation 175 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.