Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction · Florida

Heart Utilities of Jacksonville

Jacksonville, FL · ~201 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Heart Utilities of Jacksonville runs at 24% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction workplace, earning a grade A.

Heart Utilities of Jacksonville: 0.7 TCR = 24% of Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction BLS 2.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Heart Utilities of Jacksonville safety composite

Heart Utilities of Jacksonville scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 85% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.6

2021→2024

Heart Utilities of Jacksonville injury rate improved

Heart Utilities of Jacksonville's TCR fell 1.6 from 1.6 in 2021 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 1.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=1.6 · 2022=0.5 · 2023=0.6 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Jacksonville, FL AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 24% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #18/98
  • PHOTO Argos Utilities Hold…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~201 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Argos Utilities Holdings LLC. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Heart Utilities of Jacksonville in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Heart Utilities of Jacksonville averages 0.7 TCR (24% of the Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Heart Utilities of Jacksonville TCR series: 2021=1.6 · 2022=0.5 · 2023=0.6 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Heart Utilities of Jacksonville falls in its industry

1,605 Utility line (i.e., communicat establishments

Safer than 85% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 98 Utility line (i.e., communicat employers in Florida.

Heart Utilities of Jacksonville (201 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Heart Utilities of Jacksonville
Heart Utilities of Jacksonville (201 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Heart Utilities of Jacksonville has more employees than the Utility line (i.e., communication, elect median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.6 0.6 1 0 0
2022 0.5 0.0 1 0 0
2021 1.6 1.6 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · FL · Jacksonville

1,605 Utility line (i.e., communication, electric power), construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 1,776 employers in Jacksonville, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Argos Utilities Holdings LLC. 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 7102131 FPL Cavendish 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Region 109 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR K-CO Enterprises, Inc. 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Steel Fabricators LLC 201 FTE
STATE-SIZE US Gypsum Jacksonville 201 FTE
STATE-SIZE 44371B - ORLANDO ZONE 201 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1073 LOWE S OF GULF BREEZE FL 201 FTE
CITY-NEAR UF HEALTH JACKSONVILLE 4,948 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mayo Clinic Jacksonville (Clinic) 4,567 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baptist Health System Jacksonville Baptist Medical Center 4,199 FTE
CITY-NEAR FLJAC - JACKSONVILLE 4,193 FTE
NAT-TCR Conterra Longview 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Krainick Dairy LLC 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Brooks Automation US, LLC. 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Gardner Inc OH 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sumner 201 FTE
NAT-SIZE Elmonica 201 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ineos Pigment, Plant 2 201 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cadence Inc. 201 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.