Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · New York

Hearth at Greenpoint Keepsake Village

Liverpool, NY · ~77 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hearth at Greenpoint Keepsake Village runs at 171% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Hearth at Greenpoint Keepsake Village: 6.5 TCR = 171% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hearth at Greenpoint Keepsake Village safety composite

Hearth at Greenpoint Keepsake Village scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Hearth at Greenpoint Keepsake Village: 4.7 → 8.3 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 8.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Hearth at Greenpoint Keepsake Village's TCR rose 3.5 from 4.7 in 2023 to 8.3 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Liverpool, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.5 · 171% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #52/98
  • PHOTO Bethany Village
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~77 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Bethany Village (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Hearth at Greenpoint Keepsake Village in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hearth at Greenpoint Keepsake Village averages 6.5 TCR (171% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hearth at Greenpoint Keepsake Village TCR series: 2023=4.7 · 2024=8.3 · BLS 3.8

Where Hearth at Greenpoint Keepsake Village falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 54% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #52 safest of 98 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in New York.

Hearth at Greenpoint Keepsake Village (77 employees, TCR 6.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Hearth at Greenpoint Keepsake Village
Hearth at Greenpoint Keepsake Village (77 employees, TCR 6.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Hearth at Greenpoint Keepsake Village has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.3 0.0 1 0 0
2023 4.7 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · NY · Liverpool

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 141 employers in Liverpool, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Bethany Village 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Traditions of Hershey 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Arden Courts of Bingham Farms 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wabash Bickford 6.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Delaney Associates, LP 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lantek Fiber Optic Service, Inc. 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE Vestal Asphalt Inc. 77 FTE
STATE-SIZE Michels Tunneling -New York 77 FTE
CITY-NEAR Raymour & Flanigan Furniture 6,273 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation US NY Syracuse Electroncs Pkwy (1021) 2,126 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation Syracuse Campus (1021) 1,537 FTE
CITY-NEAR Advocates Incorporated 1,030 FTE
NAT-TCR Carter Component Plant 532 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Trachte Southeast 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR OSF Saint Francis Medical Center 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Haxton Masonry, Inc 6.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE RHCC Auburn 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE Iowa City Service Center 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE Laird 77 FTE
NAT-SIZE STR0503 77 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.