General freight trucking, long-distance, truckload (TL) · California

Heartland Express Rancho Cucamonga

Fontana, CA · ~88 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.7
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Heartland Express Rancho Cucamonga runs at 82% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical General freight trucking, long-distance, truckload (TL) workplace, earning a grade C.

Heartland Express Rancho Cucamonga: 3.7 TCR = 82% of General freight trucking, long-distance, truckload (TL) BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Heartland Express Rancho Cucamonga safety composite

Heartland Express Rancho Cucamonga scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 22%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.69 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.4

2018→2020

Heartland Express Rancho Cucamonga injury rate improved

Heartland Express Rancho Cucamonga's TCR fell 2.4 from 6.8 in 2018 to 4.3 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 6.8 TCR. In 2020, DART was 1.17× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=6.8 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=4.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484121 · Fontana, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.7 · 82% of ind

  • DART 4.3 DART
  • RANK #136/218
  • PHOTO Sumner Terminal
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~88 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sumner Terminal (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Heartland Express Rancho Cucamonga in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Heartland Express Rancho Cucamonga averages 3.7 TCR (82% of the General freight trucking, long-distance, truckload (TL) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Heartland Express Rancho Cucamonga TCR series: 2018=6.8 · 2019=0 · 2020=4.3 · BLS 4.5

Where Heartland Express Rancho Cucamonga falls in its industry

3,252 General freight trucking, long establishments

Safer than 39% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #136 safest of 218 General freight trucking, long employers in California.

Heartland Express Rancho Cucamonga (88 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Heartland Express Rancho Cucamonga
Heartland Express Rancho Cucamonga (88 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Heartland Express Rancho Cucamonga has more employees than the General freight trucking, long-distance, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 4.3 4.3 4 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 6.8 5.3 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484121 · CA · Fontana

3,252 General freight trucking, long-distance, truckload (TL) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 363 employers in Fontana, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sumner Terminal 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR M&C Trucking Company 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR ART PAPE TRANSFER DBA TUCKER FREIGHT LINES 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR UI 7524 (DALLAS - F) 3.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Neil Bassetti Farms, LLC 88 FTE
STATE-SIZE Espinosa 88 FTE
STATE-SIZE Shoei Foods USA, Inc. 88 FTE
STATE-SIZE Crown Hill Ranches Inc. 88 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : LAX9 2,844 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - LAX9 2,645 FTE
CITY-NEAR 08880314 FONTANA MEDICAL CENTER 2,635 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2032-08180314 2,236 FTE
NAT-TCR Mayer Electric Supply Company, Inc. - North Cobb 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Plant 1 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Milbank Manufacturing Concordia 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR AVR Ready Mix 3.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Air Assurance 88 FTE
NAT-SIZE West Side Middle School 88 FTE
NAT-SIZE Boss Precision Ltd. 88 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rest Haven Homes 88 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.