Motor vehicle interior systems (e.g., headliners, panels, seats, trims) manufacturing · Indiana

Heartland Lafayette

Lafayette, IN · ~582 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
4.1
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Heartland Lafayette runs at 76% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Motor vehicle interior systems (e.g., headliners, panels, seats, trims) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Heartland Lafayette: 4.1 TCR = 76% of Motor vehicle interior systems (e.g., headliners, panels, seats, trims) manufacturing BLS 5.4 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Heartland Lafayette safety composite

Heartland Lafayette scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.7

2016→2022

Heartland Lafayette injury rate improved

Heartland Lafayette's TCR fell 6.7 from 8.7 in 2016 to 2.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2016 at 8.7 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.41× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.7 · 2017=2.6 · 2018=1.7 · 2019=2.6 · 2020=5.4 · 2021=5.9 · 2022=2.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336360 · Lafayette, IN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 4.1 · 76% of ind

  • DART 1.7 DART
  • RANK #7/24
  • PHOTO Auria Holmesville LLC
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 137 inj
  • SIZE ~582 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Auria Holmesville LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Heartland Lafayette in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Heartland Lafayette averages 4.1 TCR (76% of the Motor vehicle interior systems (e.g., headliners, panels, seats, trims) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Heartland Lafayette TCR series: 2016=8.7 · 2017=2.6 · 2018=1.7 · 2019=2.6 · 2020=5.4 · 2021=5.9 · 2022=2 · BLS 5.4

Where Heartland Lafayette falls in its industry

384 Motor vehicle interior systems establishments

Safer than 34% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 24 Motor vehicle interior systems employers in Indiana.

Heartland Lafayette (582 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 245 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Heartland Lafayette
Heartland Lafayette (582 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 245 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Heartland Lafayette has more employees than the Motor vehicle interior systems (e.g., he median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 2.0 1.7 12 0 0
2021 5.9 4.6 28 0 0
2020 5.4 4.8 30 0 0
2019 2.6 1.4 18 0 0
2018 1.7 0.8 11 0 0
2017 2.6 1.9 15 0 0
2016 8.7 1.9 23 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336360 · IN · Lafayette

384 Motor vehicle interior systems (e.g., headliners, panels, seats, trims) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 205 employers in Lafayette, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Auria Holmesville LLC 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Techcraft Seating Systems 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR AHKMS 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lear Corporation - Hammond 4.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE 1855-ININD313 582 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Ford Meter Box Company, Inc. (Wabash) 581 FTE
STATE-SIZE Corporate Office Building 583 FTE
STATE-SIZE Penske : 5076-00 Kroger-DCM/Shelbyville, IN 581 FTE
CITY-NEAR Subaru of Indiana Automotive, Inc. 6,222 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lafayette Operations 3,025 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wabash Lafayette North 2,452 FTE
CITY-NEAR Arnett Hospital 2,070 FTE
NAT-TCR Drury Inn & Suites - Cleveland Beachwood 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Capri - Los Angeles 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 2904-SAS-ID 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Calallen Nursing & Rehab 4.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE ED Staub & Sons 582 FTE
NAT-SIZE 358361-Syracuse Ny P&Dc 582 FTE
NAT-SIZE 120439-Atlanta Ndc 582 FTE
NAT-SIZE Security, CO 582 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.