Distribution of electric power · Indiana

Heartland REMC - Markle District

Markle, IN · ~34 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
5.7
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Heartland REMC - Markle District runs at 472% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Distribution of electric power workplace, earning a grade F.

Heartland REMC - Markle District: 5.7 TCR = 472% of Distribution of electric power BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Heartland REMC - Markle District safety composite

Heartland REMC - Markle District scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

21/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Heartland REMC - Markle District: 6.3 → 7.0 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 15.2 TCR · DART/TCR 1.24× in 2024

Heartland REMC - Markle District's TCR rose 0.8 from 6.3 in 2016 to 7.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 15.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.24× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Markle, IN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 5.7 · 472% of ind

  • DART 7.0 DART
  • RANK #80/87
  • PHOTO Western Division Jas…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Western Division Jasper Complex (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Heartland REMC - Markle District in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Heartland REMC - Markle District averages 5.7 TCR (472% of the Distribution of electric power BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Heartland REMC - Markle District TCR series: 2016=6.3 · 2017=0 · 2018=3.1 · 2019=15.2 · 2020=9.3 · 2021=0 · 2022=3.2 · 2023=6.8 · 2024=7 · BLS 1.2

Where Heartland REMC - Markle District falls in its industry

2,958 Distribution of electric power establishments

Safer than 16% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #80 safest of 87 Distribution of electric power employers in Indiana.

Heartland REMC - Markle District (34 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Heartland REMC - Markle District
Heartland REMC - Markle District (34 employees, TCR 5.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Heartland REMC - Markle District has fewer employees than the Distribution of electric power median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.0 7.0 2 0 0
2023 6.8 6.8 2 0 0
2022 3.2 0.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 9.3 0.0 3 0 0
2019 15.2 9.2 5 0 0
2018 3.1 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 6.3 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · IN · Markle

2,958 Distribution of electric power employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 11 employers in Markle, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Western Division Jasper Complex 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR AMEREN MISSOURI - Mackenzie District 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Elkhorn Operating Building 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Friendswood Construction Cent 5.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE 118-NiSource-Hammond IN-CISC 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE 220-NiSource-Gary IN-GM&T 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ardizzone Enterprises Inc 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Equity Builders of Bloomington, Inc. (New Office) 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wayne Metals, LLC 172 FTE
CITY-NEAR 118_163 110 FTE
CITY-NEAR 017-FTW 107 FTE
CITY-NEAR 118_162 106 FTE
NAT-TCR Urbana 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Store #75 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Redner's Warehouse Market Lower Pottsgrove 5.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Burnette Foods, Elk Rapids 5.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE RichardsApex, Inc 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE E. H. Schwab Co. 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Alice 1907 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Columbia Cedar - Arden 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.