Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities · California

Heartland Training Center

Madera, CA · ~17 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
17.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Heartland Training Center runs at 469% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Heartland Training Center: 17.8 TCR = 469% of Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Heartland Training Center safety composite

Heartland Training Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 17.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Heartland Training Center: 17.8 → 56.0 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 56.0 TCR · DART/TCR 2.62× in 2023

Heartland Training Center's TCR rose 38.2 from 17.8 in 2022 to 56.0 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 2.62× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624120 · Madera, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 17.8 · 469% of ind

  • DART 46.7 DART
  • RANK #224/230
  • PHOTO Southside Unlimited
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~17 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Southside Unlimited (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Heartland Training Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Heartland Training Center averages 17.8 TCR (469% of the Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Heartland Training Center TCR series: 2022=17.8 · 2023=56 · BLS 3.8

Where Heartland Training Center falls in its industry

1,320 Activity centers for disabled establishments

Safer than 4% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #224 safest of 230 Activity centers for disabled employers in California.

Heartland Training Center (17 employees, TCR 17.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Heartland Training Center
Heartland Training Center (17 employees, TCR 17.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Heartland Training Center has fewer employees than the Activity centers for disabled persons, t median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 56.0 46.7 2 4 0
2022 17.8 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624120 · CA · Madera

1,320 Activity centers for disabled persons, the elderly, and persons diagnosed with intellectual and developmental disabilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 162 employers in Madera, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Southside Unlimited 17.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bay County Department on Aging 17.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR STAR Industries - Russellville 18.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Plymouth CCI 18.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE HM Clause - Dixon Research Station 17 FTE
STATE-SIZE Laub Ranches Inc 17 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sherwood Equipment Inc 17 FTE
STATE-SIZE Barton Ranch, Inc. 17 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pacific Farm Management Inc 17,529 FTE
CITY-NEAR Petroff Ag Services Inc 2,253 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 170 1,485 FTE
CITY-NEAR County of Madera 1,393 FTE
NAT-TCR Table Rock Farm, Inc. 17.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Tekton Group LLC 17.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Canandaigua Emergency Squad, Inc. 17.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 0787 17.8 TCR

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.