Air-conditioning equipment (except motor vehicle) manufacturing · Florida

Heat Pipe Technology

Tampa, FL · ~22 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Heat Pipe Technology runs at 193% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Air-conditioning equipment (except motor vehicle) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Heat Pipe Technology: 6.4 TCR = 193% of Air-conditioning equipment (except motor vehicle) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Heat Pipe Technology safety composite

Heat Pipe Technology scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

24/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.1

2016→2020

Heat Pipe Technology injury rate improved

Heat Pipe Technology's TCR fell 7.1 from 15.2 in 2016 to 8.1 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2016 at 15.2 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.63× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=15.2 · 2017=4.8 · 2018=3.9 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=8.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333415 · Tampa, FL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.4 · 193% of ind

  • DART 4.0 DART
  • RANK #19/20
  • PHOTO Crawford AE LLC dba …
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Crawford AE LLC dba Air Enterprises (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Heat Pipe Technology in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Heat Pipe Technology averages 6.4 TCR (193% of the Air-conditioning equipment (except motor vehicle) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Heat Pipe Technology TCR series: 2016=15.2 · 2017=4.8 · 2018=3.9 · 2019=0 · 2020=8.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Heat Pipe Technology falls in its industry

461 Air-conditioning equipment (ex establishments

Safer than 15% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #19 safest of 20 Air-conditioning equipment (ex employers in Florida.

Heat Pipe Technology (22 employees, TCR 6.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 164 employees and a TCR of 2.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Heat Pipe Technology
Heat Pipe Technology (22 employees, TCR 6.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 164 employees and a TCR of 2.8

Heat Pipe Technology has fewer employees than the Air-conditioning equipment (except motor median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 8.1 4.0 2 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 3.9 3.9 1 0 0
2017 4.8 4.8 1 0 0
2016 15.2 5.1 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333415 · FL · Tampa

461 Air-conditioning equipment (except motor vehicle) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 1,659 employers in Tampa, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Crawford AE LLC dba Air Enterprises 6.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Super Radiator Coils Richmond 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR First Co. Dallas 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Piper Products, Inc. 6.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Black Gold Farms Live Oak 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Barben Fruit Company, Inc. 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE SOARING EAGLE NURSERY 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hatchery- Live Oak, FL 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR Diversified Maintenance Systems LLC 10,600 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tampa General Hospital 7,849 FTE
CITY-NEAR Valet Living, LLC 6,337 FTE
CITY-NEAR ST. Joseph's Hospital (5100) 5,540 FTE
NAT-TCR Med1 NC Services, LLC. 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR IAD-SPUSA 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Pacific Tomato Growers, Ltd. - Virginia Farm 6.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Noble 6.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Moline Il Depot 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sonesta ES Suites Andover 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shield 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sonesta ES Suites Burlington MA 22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.