Physical science research and development laboratories or services (except biotechnology research and development) · Washington

Helion Energy, Redmond Location

Redmond, WA · ~32 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Helion Energy, Redmond Location runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Physical science research and development laboratories or services (except biotechnology research and development) workplace, earning a grade C.

Helion Energy, Redmond Location: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Physical science research and development laboratories or services (except biotechnology research and development) BLS 0.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Helion Energy, Redmond Location safety composite

Helion Energy, Redmond Location scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Helion Energy, Redmond Location held a steady TCR band

Helion Energy, Redmond Location's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2020 at 0.0 TCR.

2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541712 · Redmond, WA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK P100
  • PHOTO Syngenta Greensboro
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~32 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Syngenta Greensboro (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Helion Energy, Redmond Location in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Helion Energy, Redmond Location averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Physical science research and development laboratories or services (except biotechnology research and development) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Helion Energy, Redmond Location TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · BLS 0.5

Where Helion Energy, Redmond Location falls in its industry

319 Physical science research and establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Helion Energy, Redmond Location (32 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 159 employees and a TCR of 0.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Helion Energy, Redmond Location
Helion Energy, Redmond Location (32 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 159 employees and a TCR of 0.8

Helion Energy, Redmond Location has fewer employees than the Physical science research and developmen median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541712 · WA · Redmond

319 Physical science research and development laboratories or services (except biotechnology research and development) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 216 employers in Redmond, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Syngenta Greensboro 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR ExxonMobil Chemical Company Baytown Technology & Engineering Complex 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Waymo HQ 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chamblee Campus 0.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Empey Orchards, Inc. 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fryslan Ranches LLC 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE PARKLAND LIGHT & WATER 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Avista Clarkston 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR NOA Redmond Campus 1,627 FTE
CITY-NEAR Redmond, WA 1,430 FTE
CITY-NEAR REDMOND (WARED) 1,021 FTE
CITY-NEAR WARED - REDMOND 911 FTE
NAT-TCR Raleigh Managed Services 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR California Department of Transportation Facility 128 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Integration Appliance Inc. 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Airborn Inc. Addison 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Cross Technologies Group, Inc. 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gould Erectors and Riggers Inc. 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE HG840 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE HG793 32 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.